Letter to the editor regarding “The assessment of center of mass and center of pressure during quiet stance: Current applications and future directions”

2021 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 110729
Author(s):  
Peter Federolf ◽  
Rosa M Angulo-Barroso ◽  
Albert Busquets ◽  
Blai Ferrer-Uris ◽  
Øyvind Gløersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Quiet Stance ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Letter To The Editor

Evaluation of Time-to-Contact Measures for Assessing Postural Stability

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Haddad ◽  
Jeff L. Gagnon ◽  
Christopher J. Hasson ◽  
Richard E.A. Van Emmerik ◽  
Joseph Hamill
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Postural Stability ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Stability Boundary ◽  
Quiet Stance ◽  
Postural Control System ◽  
Time To Contact ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Spatial Measures

Postural stability has traditionally been examined through spatial measures of the center of mass (CoM) or center of pressure (CoP), where larger amounts of CoM or CoP movements are considered signs of postural instability. However, for stabilization, the postural control system may utilize additional information about the CoM or CoP such as velocity, acceleration, and the temporal margin to a stability boundary. Postural time-to-contact (TtC) is a variable that can take into account this additional information about the CoM or CoP. Postural TtC is the time it would take the CoM or CoP, given its instantaneous trajectory, to contact a stability boundary. This is essentially the time the system has to reverse any perturbation before stance is threatened. Although this measure shows promise in assessing postural stability, the TtC values derived between studies are highly ambiguous due to major differences in how they are calculated. In this study, various methodologies used to assess postural TtC were compared during quiet stance and induced-sway conditions. The effects of the different methodologies on TtC values will be assessed, and issues regarding the interpretation of TtC data will also be discussed.

scholarly journals Transfer and generalization of learned manipulation between unimanual and bimanual tasks

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Lee-Miller ◽  
Marco Santello ◽  
Andrew M. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Learning Transfer ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Pressure Point ◽  
Torque Generation ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Object Center ◽  
High Level ◽  
Bimanual Grasping ◽  
Partial Learning

AbstractSuccessful object manipulation, such as preventing object roll, relies on the modulation of forces and centers of pressure (point of application of digits on each grasp surface) prior to lift onset to generate a compensatory torque. Whether or not generalization of learned manipulation can occur after adding or removing effectors is not known. We examined this by recruiting participants to perform lifts in unimanual and bimanual grasps and analyzed results before and after transfer. Our results show partial generalization of learned manipulation occurred when switching from a (1) unimanual to bimanual grasp regardless of object center of mass, and (2) bimanual to unimanual grasp when the center of mass was on the thumb side. Partial generalization was driven by the modulation of effectors’ center of pressure, in the appropriate direction but of insufficient magnitude, while load forces did not contribute to torque generation after transfer. In addition, we show that the combination of effector forces and centers of pressure in the generation of compensatory torque differ between unimanual and bimanual grasping. These findings highlight that (1) high-level representations of learned manipulation enable only partial learning transfer when adding or removing effectors, and (2) such partial generalization is mainly driven by modulation of effectors’ center of pressure.

scholarly journals Can Muscle Stiffness Alone Stabilize Upright Standing?

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 1622-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro G. Morasso ◽  
Marco Schieppati
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Muscle Stiffness ◽  
The Body ◽  
Ankle Muscles ◽  
Upright Standing ◽  
Stiffness Control ◽  
Control Patterns ◽  
Physiological Values

A stiffness control model for the stabilization of sway has been proposed recently. This paper discusses two inadequacies of the model: modeling and empiric consistency. First, we show that the in-phase relation between the trajectories of the center of pressure and the center of mass is determined by physics, not by control patterns. Second, we show that physiological values of stiffness of the ankle muscles are insufficient to stabilize the body “inverted pendulum.” The evidence of active mechanisms of sway stabilization is reviewed, pointing out the potentially crucial role of foot skin and muscle receptors.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242215
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

Step-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals Effects of additional load at different heights on gait initiation: A statistical parametric mapping of center of pressure and center of mass behavior

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0242892
Author(s):  
Marcus Fraga Vieira ◽  
Fábio Barbosa Rodrigues ◽  
Alfredo de Oliveira Assis ◽  
Eduardo de Mendonça Mesquita ◽  
Thiago Santana Lemes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Statistical Parametric Mapping ◽  
Gait Initiation ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Distributed Load ◽  
Uniformly Distributed Load ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Controlled Object

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different vertical positions of an asymmetrical load on the anticipatory postural adjustments phase of gait initiation. Sixty-eight college students (32 males, 36 females; age: 23.65 ± 3.21 years old; weight: 69.98 ± 8.15 kg; height: 1.74 ± 0.08 m) were enrolled in the study. Ground reaction forces and moments were collected using two force platforms. The participants completed three trials under each of the following random conditions: no-load (NL), waist uniformly distributed load (WUD), shoulder uniformly distributed load (SUD), waist stance foot load (WST), shoulder stance foot load (SST), waist swing foot load (WSW), and shoulder swing foot load (SSW). The paired Hotelling’s T-square test was used to compare the experimental conditions. The center of pressure (COP) time series were significantly different for the SUD vs. NL, SST vs. NL, WST vs. NL, and WSW vs. NL comparisons. Significant differences in COP time series were observed for all comparisons between waist vs. shoulder conditions. Overall, these differences were greater when the load was positioned at the shoulders. For the center of mass (COM) time series, significant differences were found for the WUD vs. NL and WSW vs. NL conditions. However, no differences were observed with the load positioned at the shoulders. In conclusion, only asymmetrical loading at the waist produced significant differences, and the higher the extra load, the greater the effects on COP behavior. By contrast, only minor changes were observed in COM behavior, suggesting that the changes in COP (the controller) behavior are adjustments to maintain the COM (controlled object) unaltered.

scholarly journals Dynamic Balancing Responses in Unilateral Transtibial Amputees Following Outward-Directed Perturbations During Slow Treadmill Walking Differ Considerably for Amputated and Non-Amputated Side

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrej Olenšek ◽  
Matjaž Zadravec ◽  
Helena Burger ◽  
Zlatko Matjačić
Keyword(s):  
Stance Phase ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Dynamic Balancing ◽  
Transtibial Amputation ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Foot Strike ◽  
Transtibial Amputees ◽  
Proprioceptive Function

Abstract BackgroundDue to disrupted motor and proprioceptive function lower limb amputation imposes considerable challenges associated with balance and greatly increases risk of falling in case of perturbations during walking. The aim of this study was to investigate dynamic balancing responses in unilateral transtibial amputees when they were subjected to perturbing pushes to the pelvis in outward direction at the time of foot strike on non-amputated and amputated side during slow walking.MethodsFourteen subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation and nine control subjects participated in the study. They were subjected to perturbations that were delivered to the pelvis at the time of foot strike of either the left or right leg. We recorded trajectories of center of pressure and center of mass, durations of in-stance and stepping periods as well as ground reaction forces. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences in dynamic balancing responses between control subjects and subjects with amputation when subjected to outward-directed perturbation upon entering stance phases with non-amputated or amputated side.ResultsWhen outward-directed perturbations were delivered at the time of foot strike of the non-amputated leg, subjects with amputation were able to modulate center of pressure and ground reaction force similarly as control subjects which indicates application of in-stance balancing strategies. On the other hand, there was a complete lack of in-stance response when perturbations were delivered when the amputated leg entered the stance phase. Subjects with amputations instead used the stepping strategy and adjusted placement of the non-amputated leg in the ensuing stance phase to make a cross-step. Such response resulted in significantly higher displacement of center of mass. ConclusionsResults of this study suggest that due to the absence of the COP modulation mechanism, which is normally supplied by ankle motor function, people with unilateral transtibial amputation are compelled to choose the stepping strategy over in-stance strategy when they are subjected to outward-directed perturbation on the amputated side. However, the stepping response is less efficient than in-stance response. To improve their balancing responses to unexpected balance perturbation people fitted with passive transtibial prostheses should undergo perturbation-based balance training during clinical rehabilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document