Traditional physical therapy exercises combined with sensorimotor training: The effects on clinical outcomes for chronic neck pain in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 901-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Saadat ◽  
Reza Salehi ◽  
Hossein Negahban ◽  
Mohammad Jafar Shaterzadeh ◽  
Mohammad Mehravar ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Kyoung-Sun Park ◽  
Suna Kim ◽  
Changnyun Kim ◽  
Ji-Yeon Seo ◽  
Hyunwoo Cho ◽  
...  

Background: This two-arm, parallel, pragmatic, multicenter, clinical randomized, controlled trial with a 12-week follow-up period aimed to compare the effectiveness of pharmacopuncture therapy and physical therapy strategies for chronic neck pain. Methods: Eight sessions of pharmacopuncture therapy or physical therapy were administered within 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for neck pain. The secondary outcomes were the scores of the Northwick Park questionnaire (NPQ), VAS score for radiating arm pain, numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck and arm bothersomeness, neck disability index (NDI), patient global impression of change (PGIC), 12-item short form health survey (SF-12), and EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The protocol was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04035018) and CRIS (KCT0004243). Results: We randomly allocated 101 participants with chronic neck pain to the pharmacopuncture therapy (n = 50) or physical therapy group (n = 51). At the primary endpoint (week 5) the pharmacopuncture therapy group showed significantly superior effects regarding VAS score for neck pain and arm bothersomeness, NRS for neck pain, NDI, NPQ, and PGIC compared with the physical therapy group. These effects were sustained up to 12 weeks after follow-up. Conclusion: Compared with physical therapy, pharmacopuncture therapy had superior effects on the pain and functional recovery of patients with chronic neck pain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio Franciscatto Stieven ◽  
Giovanni Esteves Ferreira ◽  
Matheus Wiebusch ◽  
Francisco Xavier de Araújo ◽  
Luis Henrique Telles da Rosa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Shabbir ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Anam Naz ◽  
Nadia Saleem

Background and Objective: Myofascial neck pain is a common musculoskeletal problem caused by presence of trigger points and local and referred pain patterns. Chronic neck pain is responsible for the involvement of joints, ligaments, fascia and connective tissue as well. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of Maitland mobilization in patients with myofascial chronic neck pain. Methods: In this randomized, placebo treatment-controlled trial, 30 patients consecutively aged 25-45 years meeting inclusion criteria were isolated into two groups. The study group was treated with Maitland mobilization consistently for eight weeks while the control group got placebo treatment for a similar timeframe. Visual analog Scale (VAS), Neck disability index (NDI) and cervical range of motion (ROM) questionnaire was filled by patients before, intermediate and after the intervention to evaluate the severity of pain, functional ability and range of motion. Results: Following eight weeks of treatment, when compared the post treatment effects of both groups, the significance value for VAS was 0.008, for NDI p=0.030, for Flexion p=0.573, for extension p=0.001, for right rotation p<0.001, for left rotation p=0.002, for right and left side bending p<0.001. Conclusion: The study concluded that Maitland mobilization grades (I-IV) are effective in reducing pain and improving functional level of NDI scale and the ranges of cervical spine in patients with myofascial chronic neck pain. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.4220 How to cite this:Shabbir M, Arshad N, Naz A, Saleem N. Clinical outcomes of maitland mobilization in patients with Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain: A randomized controlled trial . Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.4220 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Bernal-Utrera ◽  
Juan José González-Gerez ◽  
Manuel Saavedra-Hernandez ◽  
Miguel Ángel Lérida-Ortega ◽  
Cleofás Rodríguez-Blanco

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document