scholarly journals Retrospective investigation of "paint brush borders" sign in association with local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone after intralesional curettage

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifeng He ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Weiwei Rui ◽  
Juiming Lin ◽  
Fei Yuan ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 100366
Author(s):  
Lenian Zhou ◽  
Shanyi Lin ◽  
Hanqiang Jin ◽  
Zhaoyuan Zhang ◽  
Changqing Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kenta Hayashida ◽  
Yusuke Kawabata ◽  
Ikuma Kato ◽  
Takayuki Kamiishi ◽  
Kosuke Matsuo ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol &NA; (438) ◽  
pp. 116-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L McGough ◽  
Janie Rutledge ◽  
Valerae O Lewis ◽  
Patrick P Lin ◽  
Alan W Yasko

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa J.C Pazionis ◽  
Hussain Alradwan ◽  
Benjamin M Deheshi ◽  
Robert Turcotte ◽  
Forough Farrokhyar ◽  
...  

Introduction: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excision (WE) vs intralesional curettage (IC) of GCTDR. Methods: A complete search of the applicable literature was done. Included studies reported on patients from the same cohort who were surgically treated for GCTDR with WE or IC. Two reviewers independently assessed all papers. The primary outcome measure was LR. Results: One-hundred-forty-one patients from six studies were included: 60 treated with WE, and 81 with IC. Five WE patients (8%) suffered LR whereas 25 IC patients (31%) did. The odds of LR were three times less in the WE group vs the IC group. MSTS1993 scores, where available, were on average 'good' with WE and 'excellent' with IC. Conclusions: Within statistical limitations the data support an attempt, where feasible, at wrist joint preservation and superior function with IC. Intralesional curettage is reasonable when the functional benefit outweighs the risk of recurrence as is the case in many cases of GCT of the distal radius.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
taojun gong ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Yitian Wang ◽  
Chuanxi Zheng ◽  
Jianguo Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare benign but locally aggressive bone tumor. It has a high tendency for local recurrence, which may increase the occurrence of lung metastasis. Currently, the treatment of pulmonary metastases of GCTB is controversial. Denosumab is the preferred regimen for unresectable metastatic lesions, but there are no alternative treatment options when denosumab is resistant. So far, no case reports of metastatic GCTB treated with denosumab and apatinib have been published. Case presentation: This is a case report of a 26-year-old female who experienced right knee pain for over 6 months. Radiography and computed tomography revealed osteolytic bony destruction in the proximal right tibia. Using histological, radiological, and clinical techniques, a diagnosis of GCTB was achieved. Meanwhile, the immunohistochemical stain-identified the tumor cells were positive for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). After intralesional curettage of the primary tumor and wide resection of local recurrence surgeries, she developed recurrent hemoptysis. Chest computed tomography (CT) images showed multiple pulmonary nodules. She was administrated denosumab therapy but disease progression was confirmed after four months of treatment. She then received denosumab and apatinib therapy for 24 months, after a partial response was achieved.Conclusions: We depict a case of multiple pulmonary metastases of GCTB successfully controlled by denosumab and apatinib therapy. VEGFR-2 may be an effective therapeutic target for GCTB with pulmonary metastasis when denosumab is ineffective.


2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 669-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingmin Shi ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
Yangxin Wang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Yujie Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document