scholarly journals Will COVID-19 result in a giant step backwards for women in academic science?

Author(s):  
Larissa Shamseer ◽  
Ivy Bourgeault ◽  
Eva Grunfeld ◽  
Ainsley Moore ◽  
Nazia Peer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (48) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Douglas Pettinelli ◽  
Michelle L. Engblom
Keyword(s):  

Nature ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 579 (7800) ◽  
pp. 622-622
Author(s):  
Chris Woolston
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Nusbaum ◽  
Toby SantaMaria

The scientific enterprise reflects society at large, and as such it actively disadvantages minority groups. From an ethical perspective, this system is unacceptable as it actively undermines principles of justice and social good, as well as the research principles of openness and public responsibility. Further, minority social scientists lead to better overall scientific products, meaning a diverse scientific body can also be considered an instrumental good. Thus, centering minority voices in science is an ethical imperative. This paper outlines what can be done to actively center these scientists, including changing the way metrics are used to assess the performance of individual scientists and altering the reward structure within academic science to promote heterogenous research groups.


Author(s):  
Aleksandr Ageev ◽  
◽  
Nikolay Makhootov ◽  
Fillip Trunov ◽  
Vladimir Zolotorev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Brooke Rumper ◽  
Elizabeth Frechette ◽  
Daryl B. Greenfield ◽  
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek

The present study examined the roles that language of assessment, language dominance, and teacher language use during instruction play in Dual Language Learner (DLL) science scores. A total of 255 Head Start DLL children were assessed on equated science assessments in English and Spanish. First overall differences between the two languages were examined, then associations between performance on science assessments were compared and related to children’s language dominance, teacher quantity of English and Spanish, and teachers’ academic science language. When examined as a homogeneous group, DLLs did not perform differently on English or Spanish science assessments. However, when examined heterogeneously, Spanish-dominant DLLs performed better on Spanish science assessments. The percentage of English and Spanish used by teachers did not affect children’s science scores. Teachers’ use of Spanish academic science language impacted children’s performance on science assessments, but English did not. The results have implications for the assessment of DLLs and teacher language use during instruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document