Relativity, mobility, and optimal nonlinear income taxation in an open economy

2020 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 57-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darong Dai ◽  
Wenzheng Gao ◽  
Guoqiang Tian
Keyword(s):  
Open Economy ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Nonlinear Income Taxation

scholarly journals Income Taxation Rules and Stability of a Small Open Economy

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 103236
Author(s):  
Been-Lon Chen ◽  
Yunfang Hu ◽  
Kazuo Mino
Keyword(s):  
Open Economy ◽  
Small Open Economy ◽  
Income Taxation

scholarly journals A Positive Theory of Income Taxation

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Electoral Competition ◽  
Income Redistribution ◽  
Competition Model ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Tax Policies ◽  
Positive Theory ◽  
Income Distributions ◽  
Income Groups ◽  
Dynamic Version ◽  
Nonlinear Income Taxation

We explore the consequences of electoral competition for nonlinear income taxation. Our model is a dynamic version of the standard two-party electoral competition model adapted to nonlinear income taxation. The theory has a number of desirable features. First, equilibria always exist, even though the set of admissible tax policies is multidimensional. Second, the Nash set can be characterized generically, and its components give sharp predictions. Third, the features of equilibrium tax policies depend only on empirically meaningful fundamentals.Equilibrium tax schedules benefit the more numerous income groups and place the burden of taxation on income groups with fewer voters. For empirical income distributions, the features of an equilibrium tax schedule are reminiscent of Director's law of public income redistribution (Stigler [39]).

scholarly journals Market Power and Income Taxation

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-354
Author(s):  
Louis Kaplow
Keyword(s):  
Labor Supply ◽  
Market Power ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Policy Rule ◽  
Endogenous Labor Supply ◽  
Downward Shift ◽  
Producer Surplus ◽  
Endogenous Labor ◽  
Nonlinear Income Taxation

This article analyzes concerns about market power and inequality in a model with multiple sectors, heterogeneous abilities, endogenous labor supply, and nonlinear income taxation. Proportional markups with no profit dissipation have no effect on the economy, and a policy that reduces a nonproportional markup raises (lowers) welfare when it is higher (lower) than a weighted average of other markups. With proportional (partial or full) profit dissipation, proportional markups are equivalent to a downward shift of the distribution of abilities, and the optimal policy rule with nonproportional markups maximizes consumer plus producer surplus despite concerns for distribution and labor supply distortion. (JEL D43, D61, H21, H23, H24, K21, L13, L40)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document