scholarly journals Estimation of random coefficients logit demand models with interactive fixed effects

2018 ◽  
Vol 206 (2) ◽  
pp. 613-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyungsik Roger Moon ◽  
Matthew Shum ◽  
Martin Weidner
2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangjun Su ◽  
Qihui Chen

This paper proposes a residual-based Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test for slope homogeneity in large-dimensional panel data models with interactive fixed effects. We first run the panel regression under the null to obtain the restricted residuals and then use them to construct our LM test statistic. We show that after being appropriately centered and scaled, our test statistic is asymptotically normally distributed under the null and a sequence of Pitman local alternatives. The asymptotic distributional theories are established under fairly general conditions that allow for both lagged dependent variables and conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form by relying on the concept of conditional strong mixing. To improve the finite-sample performance of the test, we also propose a bootstrap procedure to obtain the bootstrap p-values and justify its validity. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that the test has correct size and satisfactory power. We apply our test to study the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economic growth model.


2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 1161-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Long ◽  
Chang Liu ◽  
Haiyan Song

This study investigates whether pooling can improve the forecasting performance of tourism demand models. The short-term domestic tourism demand forecasts for 341 cities in China using panel data (pooled) models are compared with individual ordinary least squares (OLS) and naïve benchmark models. The pooled OLS model demonstrates much worse forecasting performance than the other models. This indicates the huge heterogeneity of tourism across cities in China. A marked improvement with the inclusion of fixed effects suggests that destination features that stay the same or vary very little over time can explain most of the heterogeneity. Adding spatial effects to the panel data models also increases forecasting accuracy, although the improvement is small. The spatial distribution of spillover effects is drawn on a map and a spatial pattern is recognized. Finally, when both spatial and temporal effects are taken into account, pooling improves forecasting performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document