Disentangling preferences and expectations in stated preference analysis with respondent uncertainty: The case of invasive species prevention

2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bill Provencher ◽  
David J. Lewis ◽  
Kathryn Anderson
2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 871-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corene Matyas ◽  
Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan ◽  
Ignatius Cahyanto ◽  
Brijesh Thapa ◽  
Lori Pennington-Gray ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1059-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Paolucci ◽  
Emmanouil Mentzakis ◽  
Thierry Defechereux ◽  
Louis W Niessen

2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (s1) ◽  
pp. 83-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Mcintosh ◽  
Jason F. Shogren ◽  
David C. Finnoff

Herein we explore the economic value of delaying inevitable environmental damage due to aquatic invasive species, which is a problem especially relevant to tropic and subtropical regions. We developed an analytical framework and tested it using a stated preference survey. The results suggest that delaying the impacts can be valuable. Other tests reveal characteristics of the willingness-to-pay estimates that are consistent with economic theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document