GASTRIC AND UPPER GI CANCERS IN THE ELDERLY

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S7
Author(s):  
Su-Pin Choo
Keyword(s):  
Upper Gi ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 497-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn LDM Brücher ◽  
Masaki Kitajima ◽  
Jörg Rüdiger Siewert
Keyword(s):  
Upper Gi ◽  

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 833-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song ◽  
Brian C. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Upper Gi ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F Chao ◽  
G.Y.H Lip ◽  
S.A Chen

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulants (OACs) may serve as a type of “screening test” for the diagnosis of occult gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies through a clinical presentation with bleeding. Objective We aimed to investigate the 1-year incidence and predictors of GI cancers after GI bleeeding events among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with warfarin or NOACs. Second, we aimed to compare the risk of mortality after GI cancers between patients treated with warfarin or NOACs. Methods A total of 10,845 anticoagulated AF patients who experienced hospitalizations due to GI bleeding without prior history of GI cancers were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients were followed up for incident GI cancers for up to 1 year. Results Within 1 year after GI bleeding, 290 (2.67%) patients were diagnosed to have GI tract cancers. More patients treated with NOACs were diagnosed to have GI cancers than those receiving warfarin (68/1,759; 3.87% [NOACs] versus 222/9,086; 2.44% [warfarin], p<0.001) with an odds ratio (OR) 1.606 (95% CI: 1.208–2.117, p<0.001). Age (OR 1.025 [95% CI: 1.012–1.037] per 1 year increment) and male sex (1.356 [95% CI: 1.050–1.700]) were independently associated with the diagnosis of GI cancers within 1 year after GI bleeding. Among 290 patients diagnosed to have GI cancers, 131 (45.2%) experienced mortality within 1 year. The risk of mortality was lower for patients treated with NOACs compared to those receiving warfarin (23.5% versus 51.8%) with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.441 (95% CI: 0.262–0.744, p<0.001) (Figure). Conclusions Incident GI cancers were diagnosed in 1 in 37 AF patients at 1 year after OAC-related GI bleeding, which were more common among patients treated with NOACs (1 in 26) compared to warfarin (1 in 41). Detailed surveys for occult GI cancers were necessary for these patients, especially for the elderly males. Survival curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Gut ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A13-A14 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sugumaran ◽  
J. Hurley ◽  
P. George ◽  
J. Pye
Keyword(s):  
Upper Gi ◽  

Author(s):  
Björn L. D. M. Brücher ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Philipp Schnabel ◽  
Martin Daumer ◽  
Timothy J. Wallace ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. S490-S491
Author(s):  
Sameer Siddique ◽  
Julie Deacon ◽  
Ian Sargeant ◽  
Danielle Morris

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3516-3516
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ohba ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Hiroya Taniguchi ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Hideaki Bando ◽  
...  

3516 Background: We recently reported that clinical assessment of genomic biomarkers using ctDNA had advantages over tumor tissue-based sequencing for enrollment into matched clinical trials across a wide range of GI cancers. Herein we investigated the utility of ctDNA in non-CRC cancers in a SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN and GOZILA combined analysis. Methods: In GI-SCREEN, tumor tissue samples of pts with non-CRC were analyzed by a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay, Oncomine Comprehensive Assay, since Feb 2015. In GOZILA, plasma samples of non-CRC pts were analyzed by an NGS-based ctDNA assay, Guardant360, since Feb 2018. Results: As of Apr 2019, 2,952 pts in GI-SCREEN and 633 pts in GOZILA were enrolled. Baseline characteristics between the groups were well matched except that GOZILA included more pancreatic (P < 0.0001) and liver cancers (P = 0.016) but fewer gastric cancers (P < 0.0001) and GIST (P = 0.020) than GI-SCREEN. The success rates of the tests were 86.6% in GI-SCREEN and 87.3% in GOZILA (P = 0.649). Median turnaround time (TAT) was 37 days in GI-SCREEN and 12 days in GOZILA (P < 0.0001). The proportion of cases with actionable alterations detected (tissue vs blood; 29.8% vs 46.8%, P < 0.0001) and enrolled into matched clinical trials (4.8% vs 6.5%, P = 0.286) for each group by cancer type are shown in the Table. Pts with upper GI cancers, especially those in GOZILA, were more often enrolled into matched trials; trial enrollment for those with hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) or other cancers was similar regardless of testing method. Median time from GI-SCREEN or GOZILA enrollment to clinical trial enrollment was 5.0 and 1.0 months (mo), respectively (P < 0.0001). Objective response rates (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not significantly different (tissue vs. blood; ORR: 14.6 vs. 26.3%, P = 0.30: median PFS: 3.3 vs. 2.6 mo, P = 0.71). Conclusions: Clinical sequencing of ctDNA, with its shorter TAT, contributed to rapid enrollment of non-CRC pts into matched clinical trials compared to those tested by tumor tissue sequencing, particularly for those with upper GI cancer, without compromising efficacy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000029315 . [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document