Early Mobilization After Volar Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Radial Fractures in Older Patients—A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1047-1054.e1
Author(s):  
Thomas Juul Sørensen ◽  
Søren Ohrt-Nissen ◽  
Kecia V. Ardensø ◽  
Gunnar H. Laier ◽  
Susanne K. Mallet
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1510-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lattmann ◽  
Christoph Meier ◽  
Michael Dietrich ◽  
Jens Forberger ◽  
Andreas Platz

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib Javed ◽  
Rizwan Shahid ◽  
Ravi Thimmiah ◽  
Muj El-Deen

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092
Author(s):  
Umi Budi Rahayu ◽  
Samekto Wibowo ◽  
Ismail Setyopranoto

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation (EM) after-ischemic stroke is a motor learning intervention aimed to restore nerve cells and to improve balance and functional ability. Unfortunately, the study of when this intervention began has not been widely studied. AIM: On this study was compared the effect of EM started at 24 hours and 48 hours after an ischemic stroke on balance and functional ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trial involving 40 patients on 2 groups meeting predefined inclusion criteria. The levels of balance were measured using the Berg Balance Scale, and the functional ability was measured using the Barthel Index, at 5th and 7th day. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in both balance (p = 0.038) and functional ability (p = 0.021) obtained on the 7th day of assessment between both groups. A significant difference on the 5th day was observed only in the functional ability (p = 0.002) and not in the balance (p = 0.147), between the groups. CONCLUSION: EM started at 24 hours after the ischemic stroke has been found to have a better impact on balance and functional ability compared to that at 48 hours.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Pashupati Chaudhary ◽  
B P Shrestha ◽  
G K Khanal ◽  
R Rijal ◽  
R Maharjan

Background: Extra-articular fracture of proximal tibia is one of common injury.The study is randomized controlled trial in which individuals sustaining a fracture of the proximal metaphysis of the tibia will be operatively managed by one of two strategies. The first strategy involves fixation of the fracture with a reamed, interlocking intramedullary nail (Nail Group). The second treatment strategy involves percutaneous fixation of the fracture with a locking plate (Plate Group).Objective: To compare the functional outcome of intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures in adults in terms of procedure time, time to achieve union, functional outcome, blood loss, cost of treatment, complication if any. Methods: It is randomised controlled trial study. The patients were randomized into two groups, each of size 60: Group A (IMIL group) Group B (Locking Plate group). During procedure patients were evaluated for blood loss, procedure time or any complications. Immediate post operative complications were taken into account and post operative radiological parameters measured.Results: A total of 120 patients (75 male and 45 female) were included in the study. Fifty five patients were less than 25 years age group followed by 30 patients between 25-40 yrs, 25 patients less than 25 age group and 10 patients more than 55 years. The average blood loss is 95 ml in IMIL group and 105 ml in locked plate group.Conclusion: IMIL is more expensive than percutaneous locked plates IMIL came out as a shorter surgery with little blood loss however at the same time much costlier to locked plating. Health Renaissance 2015;13 (3): 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document