scholarly journals System stress testing of bank liquidity risk

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 22-40
Author(s):  
Spyros Pagratis ◽  
Nikolas Topaloglou ◽  
Mike Tsionas
GIS Business ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Eugenia Schmitt

The need to focus on banks funding structure and stress testing in an explicit way arose as a consequence of the crisis of past decades. Liquidity risks usually occur as a consequence of other kinds of risks, hence analysing scenarios in a prospective manner is essential for the assessment if the bank can fulfill its obligations as they come due and if its funding costs are appropriate. The structural liquidity risk and the degree of the liquidity mismatch can be measured based on the liquidity gap analysis, where expected cash-in- and outflows, divided in different time-buckets are depicted. The liquidity gap report (LGR) shows if a liquidity shortcoming appears in the future and how high is the amount a bank would have to pay, if any hedging were not possible. This paper shows how to build a comprehensive LGR which is the base for both, liquidity and wealth risk evaluation. To improve the accuracy of the forecast, the counterbalancing capacity will be incorporated into the LGR. This tool is a methodological basis for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment and stress testing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131
Author(s):  
Каисси Ал ◽  
Kaissi Al

Sustainability tests are considered as a tool for measuring risk, especially with regard to the assessment of possible events in the banking sector as a result of changes in the general economic situation or the occurrence of certain events in the bank. The aim of this study is to test the ability of two Syrian private banks to bear liquidity risk using data for 2018 in accordance with the coefficients set by the Central Bank of Syria. The results of the study showed the ability of banks to resist liquidity risk in case of sudden withdrawal of funds from current deposits and the availability of sufficient funds to meet it. The sudden drop in current deposits in private Syrian banks does not reduce their ability to pay their financial obligations. Both banks successfully passed testing, achieved a positive net inflow, and the liquidity ratio after the test indicates a low liquidity risk. In other words, Syrian private banks are able to cope with liquidity risks. Private banks, whether ordinary or Islamic, are largely dependent on customer deposits, so any sudden negative changes that occur with these deposits have a negative effect on the liquidity of banks. The Syrian banking sector does not suffer from liquidity risk, has high liquidity ratios and is able to cope with economic changes. When adopting banking laws and regulations, Syrian regulators and authorities should take into account the differences between conventional and Islamic banks in terms of liquidity risks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-273
Author(s):  
Hana Hejlová ◽  
Zlatuše Komárková ◽  
Marek Rusnák

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Roncalli ◽  
Amina Cherief ◽  
Fatma Karray-Meziou ◽  
Margaux Regnault

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document