scholarly journals Impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on long-term outcome in patients with lower extremity artery disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 659-664
Author(s):  
Koji Yanaka ◽  
Hirokuni Akahori ◽  
Takahiro Imanaka ◽  
Kojiro Miki ◽  
Nagataka Yoshihara ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Yanaka ◽  
H Akahori ◽  
T Imanaka ◽  
K Miki ◽  
N Yoshihara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and heart failure (HF) in patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is associated with an increased risk for adverse events. However, relationship between long-term outcome in patient with LEAD and LV diastolic dysfunction remains unclear. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the impact of LV diastolic dysfunction on long-term outcome in patients with LEAD. Methods Two hundred patients (male 66%, mean age 76±9 years) with preserved LV systolic function assessed by echocardiography (ejection fraction ≥50%) were enrolled from a single-center database between January 2013 to May 2015. Baseline LEAD was identified by ABI <0.9 or history of lower extremity revascularization. Diagnosis of LV diastolic dysfunction was based on the ASE/EACVI guidelines. The 3-year cumulative incidence of primary endpoint compared between LEAD patients with LV diastolic dysfunction than those without. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for HF during 3 years follow-up. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether LV diastolic dysfunction was independently associated with the primary endpoint. Results LV diastolic dysfunction was identified in 31%. The mean observation period was 32±21 months. The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in patients with LV diastolic dysfunction than those without at 3 years (30% vs 16%, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between 2 groups in the myocardial infarction (3% vs 3%, P=0.73) and stroke (3% vs 3%, P=0.55). Cardiovascular death (19% vs 7%, P=0.01) and hospitalization for HF (19% vs 7%, P=0.01) were significantly higher in patients with LV diastolic dysfunction. In multivariate analysis, LV diastolic dysfunction was an independent predictor for primary endpoint (HR=2.28, 95% CI 1.10–4.73, P=0.02) (Table) Predictor for primary endpoint Factors Univariate model Multivariate model Hazard ratio [95% CI] P value Hazard ratio [95% CI] P value Age 1.03 [0.98–1.08] 0.24 1.03 [0.98–1.08] 0.22 Chronic kidney disease 1.53 [0.77–3.07] 0.23 1.25 [0.60–2.58] 0.55 Coronary artery disease 1.08 [0.53–2.18] 0.84 1.18 [0.56–2.50] 0.65 Cerebrovascular disease 1.93 [0.74–5.02] 0.17 2.28 [0.86–6.05] 0.10 Critical limb ischemia 3.75 [1.68–8.37] <0.01 3.72 [0.56–2.50] <0.01 LV diastolic dysfunction 2.37 [1.18–4.74] 0.02 2.28 [1.10–4.73] 0.03 Conclusions LV diastolic dysfunction increased the risk for adverse events in patients with LEAD. Acknowledgement/Funding None


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Cornel Ioan Bitea ◽  
Ioan Maniţiu ◽  
Georgiana Bălțat

Abstract Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important determinant of long-term outcome in patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). In this study we evaluated the CAD prevalence among LEAD patients and the association of LEAD lesions location with the CAD presence and severity. 203 patients with LEAD, referred for peripheral and simultaneous coronary angiography, were evaluated. LEAD and CAD were considered angiographically significant for stenosis higher than 50% of arterial lumen. More than two-thirds of LEAD patients had significant CAD, half of them having multi-vessel CAD and a quarter single CAD. Infrapoplitheal arterial lesions seemed to be the strongest predictor of CAD being associated with significant and multi-vessel CAD and also with the presence of left main (LM) lesions. Femoral artery lesions were highly associated with multi-vessel CAD, but there was no association with significant CAD and LM lesions. No association was found between iliac artery lesions and CAD.


2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 922-922
Author(s):  
Ioannis Vlasseros ◽  
Vasiliki Katsi ◽  
Gregory Vyssoulis ◽  
Ioannis Pylarinos ◽  
Dimitrios Richter ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document