scholarly journals Serum interleukin-18 levels as a predictor for patients with genetic dysfunction of cytochrome P450 2C19 in dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 479-486
Author(s):  
Takashi Ishimatsu ◽  
Ken-ichiro Sasaki ◽  
Tatsuyuki Kakuma ◽  
Atsushi Harada ◽  
Yuji Hirakawa ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Scott L Charland ◽  
Barnabie C Agatep ◽  
Daniel C Malone ◽  
Eric J Stanek

OBJECTIVES: Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype has been shown to affect cardiovascular (CV) outcomes for clopidogrel but not prasugrel. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided vs. routine antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients. METHODS: We constructed a literature-based, decision analytic, Markov model (TreeAge 2009) to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided aspirin plus either clopidogrel or prasugrel therapy vs. no genotyping. Post-initial ACS CV events were based on the TRITON-TIMI 38 study and related costs were derived primarily using 2007 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project DRGs for nonfatal MI and stroke, CV death, intracranial hemorrhage, other life-threatening bleed, and minor bleed. Additional costs and disease-state utilities were obtained from other published sources. All costs were adjusted to 2009 $US using the Consumer Price Index medical care component. The model allowed for clopidogrel/prasugrel discontinuation and aspirin monotherapy. Model sensitivity was assessed using 1-way and multi-way analysis of influential parameters. RESULTS: The base case model demonstrated that CYP2C19 genotype guided antiplatelet therapy yielded lower overall annual cost and greater efficacy vs. no genotyping ( Table ). The model was sensitive to (in declining order): clopidogrel cost/day ($1 to $5.78), prasugrel cost/day ($4.09 to $ 6.81), % CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers on clopidogrel (60% to 100%), CYP2C19 test cost ($60 to $250), and monthly CV event management cost. A threshold value for clopidogrel at <$2.14/day favored the no genotyping strategy. However, the genotyping strategy was dominant when clopidogrel cost =$1/day and a CYP2C19 test cost threshold of <$125 on 2-way analysis. CONCLUSIONS: CYP2C19 genotype-guided clopidogrel or prasugrel therapy is cost-effective for up to 1 year in ACS patients, and can remain a preferred strategy at a hypothetical generic clopidogrel cost of $1.00/day. Table Strategy1 Annual Cost Incremental Cost Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) Incremental QALY Cost/QALY Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICER) CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided $ 3,211 0.7212 $ 4,452 No Gentoyping $ 3,331 $120 0.6767 - (0.0445) $ 4,921 (Dominated) 1Base case values:Drug wholesale acquisition cost/day: clopidogrel $4.62, prasugrel $5.45; Baseline post-ACS utility = 0.83; Monthly cost for post-CV event management = $351; CYP2C19 genotyping =$185; After genotyping: 80% of extensive metabolizers, 20% of intermediate metabolizers and 10% of poor metabolizers on clopidogrel; 80% on clopidogrel without genotyping; Willingness to pay = $200


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (13) ◽  
pp. 2489-2495 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Kassimis ◽  
Eleana F. Stavrou ◽  
Dimitrios Alexopoulos ◽  
Aglaia Athanassiadou

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Fu ◽  
Nobuaki Suzuki ◽  
Kaoru Takada ◽  
Hirosada Yamamoto ◽  
Shuichi Ishikawa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junichiro Shimamatsu ◽  
Ken-ichiro Sasaki ◽  
Yoshio Katsuki ◽  
Tomohiro Kawasaki ◽  
Yoshinobu Murasato ◽  
...  

Abstract Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is administered following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stent implantation. Several studies have reported the effects of switching between P2Y12 inhibitors on platelet reactivity (P2Y12 reaction units: PRU), from acute to late phase after PCI. However, the effect of switching at very late phase is unknown. This study examined the effect on PRU in Japanese coronary heart disease patients with long-term DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) when switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study. The median DAPT duration at enrollment was 1824.0 days. Twenty-three patients with PRU ≥ 208 at enrollment were randomly assigned into either continuing to receive clopidogrel (Continued Group; n = 11) or switching to prasugrel (Switched Group; n = 12). The primary endpoint was the rate of patients who achieved PRU < 208 at the end of 12 weeks of treatment, which was significantly higher in Switched Group relative to Continued Group (90.0% vs. 36.4%; P = 0.024). The secondary endpoint was the PRU at week 12 in groups subdivided according to cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotypes. At week 12, extensive metabolizers (EM Group) had 202.3 ± 60.0 and 174.5 ± 22.3 in Continued Group and Switched Group (P = 0.591), respectively; intermediate and poor metabolizers (non-EM Group) had 229.4 ± 36.9 and 148.4 ± 48.4 in Continued Group and Switched Group (P = 0.002), respectively. The PRU for non-EM Group was significantly reduced in Switched Group. Thus, for patients with long-term DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) after PCI with coronary stent implantation, switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel resulted in a stable reduction in PRU, regardless of CYP2C19 polymorphism.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (16) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
JON O. EBBERT ◽  
ERIC G. TANGALOS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document