Lipschitz (p,r,s)-integral operators and Lipschitz (p,r,s)-nuclear operators

2018 ◽  
Vol 461 (2) ◽  
pp. 1115-1137
Author(s):  
Amar Belacel ◽  
Dongyang Chen
2012 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsvald Lima ◽  
Vegard Lima ◽  
Eve Oja

Let $X$ be a Banach space and let $\mathcal I$ be the Banach operator ideal of integral operators. We prove that $X$ has the $\lambda$-bounded approximation property ($\lambda$-BAP) if and only if for every operator $T\in \mathcal I(X,C[0,1]^*)$ there exists a net $(S_\alpha)$ of finite-rank operators on $X$ such that $S_\alpha\to I_X$ pointwise and 26767 \limsup_\alpha\|TS_\alpha\|_{\mathcal I}\leq\lambda\|T\|_{\mathcal I}. 26767 We also prove that replacing $\mathcal I$ by the ideal $\mathcal N$ of nuclear operators yields a condition which is equivalent to the weak $\lambda$-BAP.


2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (13) ◽  
pp. 5270-5282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongyang Chen ◽  
Bentuo Zheng

1997 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dumitru Popa

AbstractFor X and Y Banach spaces, let X⊗εY, be the injective tensor product. If Z is also a Banach space and U ∊ L(X⊗εY,Z) we consider the operatorWe prove that if U ∊ PI(X⊗εY, Z), then U# ∊ I(X, PI(Y,Z)). This result is then applied in the case of operators defined on the space of all X-valued continuous functions on the compact Hausdorff space T. We obtain also an affirmative answer to a problem of J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl about the RNP property for the space of all nuclear operators; namely if X* and Y have the RNP and Y can be complemented in its bidual, then N(X, Y) has the RNP.


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 610-629
Author(s):  
G. A. Karapetyan ◽  
H. A. Petrosyan
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Brian Street

This chapter turns to a general theory which generalizes and unifies all of the examples in the preceding chapters. A main issue is that the first definition from the trichotomy does not generalize to the multi-parameter situation. To deal with this, strengthened cancellation conditions are introduced. This is done in two different ways, resulting in four total definitions for singular integral operators (the first two use the strengthened cancellation conditions, while the later two are generalizations of the later two parts of the trichotomy). Thus, we obtain four classes of singular integral operators, denoted by A1, A2, A3, and A4. The main theorem of the chapter is A1 = A2 = A3 = A4; i.e., all four of these definitions are equivalent. This leads to many nice properties of these singular integral operators.


Author(s):  
Brian Street

This chapter discusses a case for single-parameter singular integral operators, where ρ‎ is the usual distance on ℝn. There, we obtain the most classical theory of singular integrals, which is useful for studying elliptic partial differential operators. The chapter defines singular integral operators in three equivalent ways. This trichotomy can be seen three times, in increasing generality: Theorems 1.1.23, 1.1.26, and 1.2.10. This trichotomy is developed even when the operators are not translation invariant (many authors discuss such ideas only for translation invariant, or nearly translation invariant operators). It also presents these ideas in a slightly different way than is usual, which helps to motivate later results and definitions.


Vestnik MEI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Abdukhafiz A. Bobodzhanova ◽  
◽  
Valeriy F. Safonov ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document