Bladder backfilling versus standard catheter removal for trial of void after outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Xue Dong ◽  
Changqing Pan ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Mengdan Shi ◽  
Yonghong Li ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 2699-2707
Author(s):  
Greg Marchand ◽  
Kelly Ware ◽  
Malini Govindan ◽  
Ahmed T Masoud ◽  
Alexa King ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-001991
Author(s):  
Steven Bisch ◽  
Rachelle Findley ◽  
Christina Ince ◽  
Maria Nardell ◽  
Gregg Nelson

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism remains a significant complication following major gynecologic surgery. Evidence is lacking on whether it is beneficial to give pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis pre-operatively. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the role of pre-operative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in preventing post-operative venous thromboembolism.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials were searched to find randomized controlled, cohort, and case–control trials comparing pre-operative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis to no prophylaxis, mechanical prophylaxis, or only post-operative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for open and minimally invasive major gynecologic surgery (benign and malignant conditions). Two authors independently assessed abstracts, full-text articles, and methodological quality. Data were extracted and pooled using ORs for random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was explored using forest plots, Q-statistic, and I2 statistics. Planned subgroup analysis of use of sequential compression devices, equivalent versus non-equivalent post-operative prophylaxis, cancer diagnosis, and methodological quality were performed.ResultsSome 503 unique studies were found, and 16 studies (28 806 patients) were included in the systematic review. Twelve studies (14 273 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The OR for incidence of post-operative venous thromboembolism was 0.59 (95% CI 0.39, 0.89), favoring pre-operative pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis compared with no pre-operative pharmacologic prophylaxis (Q=13.80, I2=20.30). In studies where post-operative care was equivalent between groups, the OR for venous thromboembolism was 0.56 (95% CI 0.22, 1.40). Pre-operative pharmacologic prophylaxis demonstrated greatest benefit when utilized with both intra-operative and post-operative sequential compression devices (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30, 0.64) compared with when no sequential compression devices were utilized (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.63, 2.56). When looking at only studies determined to be of high quality, the results no longer reached significance (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.36, 1.46).ConclusionsPre-operative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis decreases the odds of venous thromboembolism in the peri-operative period for major gynecologic oncology surgery by approximately 40%. It remains unclear whether this benefit is present in benign and minor procedures. Adequately powered studies are needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 2011-2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung Lee ◽  
Tyler McKechnie ◽  
Jeremy E. Springer ◽  
Aristithes G. Doumouras ◽  
Dennis Hong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vito Andrea Capozzi ◽  
Giulia Armano ◽  
Andrea Rosati ◽  
Alessandro Tropea ◽  
Antonio Biondi

2021 ◽  
pp. 103148
Author(s):  
Stuart McIntosh ◽  
Hunter Ross ◽  
Scrimgeour Duncan ◽  
Bekheit Mohammed ◽  
Stevenson Lynn ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 382-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanny J.A. de Groot ◽  
Stephanie M.C. Ament ◽  
José M.C. Maessen ◽  
Cornelis H.C. Dejong ◽  
Jos M.P. Kleijnen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document