Osteolysis of the Distal Clavicle: Serial Improvement and Normalization of Acromioclavicular Joint Space with Conservative Care

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke L. Gajeski ◽  
Norman W. Kettner

Author(s):  
Ala M. A. Elgyoum ◽  
Marwa H. Mohammed ◽  
Ahmed Abdelrahim ◽  
Mogahid M.A Zidan ◽  
Moram A. Fagiry ◽  
...  




2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-175
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Johnson


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Ho-Jung Kang ◽  
Il-Hyun Koh ◽  
Jong-Hwan Joo ◽  
Yong-Min Chun ◽  
Hyung-Sik Kim




Author(s):  
Daniël E Verstift ◽  
Matthijs P Somford ◽  
Derek F P van Deurzen ◽  
Michel P J van den Bekerom

This classic discusses the original publication “Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation” by Weaver and Dunn, which collaborated to develop a technique for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in 1972. Their surgical technique described resection of 2 cm of the distal clavicle and transfer of the acromial end of the coracoacromial ligament into the medullary canal of the distal clavicle. (modified) Weaver-Dunn procedures have been regarded as one of the most effective techniques to treat complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation for a long time. However, anatomic reconstructions have taken over this position since recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated superior results. Although the Weaver-Dunn procedure has fallen out of favour, it remains of historical significance. For this reason, this review will comprise the historical overview of the Weaver-Dunn procedure, the men behind the eponym and the clinical implication then and now.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document