scholarly journals Not State Self-Control, but Time Predicts Unhealthy Food Purchases

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. S87-S88
Author(s):  
Stefanie Salmon ◽  
Gitte Kloek ◽  
Jacqueline Langius ◽  
Sanne de Vries
2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh Haynes ◽  
Eva Kemps ◽  
Robyn Moffitt ◽  
Philip Mohr

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Lark Lim ◽  
Molly T. Penrod ◽  
Oh-Ryeong Ha ◽  
Jared M. Bruce ◽  
Amanda S. Bruce

Understanding why people make unhealthy food choices and how to promote healthier choices is critical to prevent obesity. Unhealthy food choices may occur when individuals fail to consider health attributes as quickly as taste attributes in their decisions, and this bias may be modifiable by health-related external cues. One hundred seventy-eight participants performed a mouse-tracking food-choice task with and without calorie information. With the addition of calorie information, participants made healthier choices. Without calorie information, the initial integration of health attributes in overweight individuals’ decisions was about 230 ms delayed relative to the taste attributes, but calorie labeling promoted healthier choices by speeding up the integration of health attributes during a food-choice task. Our study suggests that obesogenic choices are related to the relative speed with which taste and health attributes are integrated into the decision process and that this bias is modifiable by external health-related cues.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Thomas ◽  
Kalpesh Kaushik Desai ◽  
Satheeshkumar Seenivasan

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurens Cherchye ◽  
Bram de Rock ◽  
Rachel Griffith ◽  
Martin O'Connell ◽  
Kate Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin N. Hawley ◽  
Corrine M. Huber ◽  
Lyle G. Best ◽  
Barbara V. Howard ◽  
Jason Umans ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The prevalence of poor diet quality and type 2 diabetes are exceedingly high in many rural American Indian (AI) communities. Because of limited resources and infrastructure in some communities, implementation of interventions to promote a healthy diet is challenging—which may exacerbate health disparities by region (urban/rural) and ethnicity (AIs/other populations). It is critical to adapt existing evidence-based healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking programs to be relevant to underserved populations with a high burden of diabetes and related complications. The Cooking for Health Study will work in partnership with an AI community in South Dakota to develop a culturally-adapted 12-month distance-learning-based healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking intervention to improve diet among AI adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods The study will enroll 165 AIs with physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes who reside on the reservation. Participants will be randomized to an intervention or control arm. The intervention arm will receive a 12-month distance-learning curriculum adapted from Cooking Matters® that focuses on healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills. In-person assessments at baseline, month 6 and month 12 will include completion of the Nutrition Assessment Shared Resources Food Frequency Questionnaire and a survey to assess frequency of healthy and unhealthy food purchases. Primary outcomes of interest are: (1) change in self-reported intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs); and (2) change in the frequency of healthy and unhealthy food purchases. Secondary outcomes include: (1) change in self-reported food budgeting skills; (2) change in self-reported cooking skills; and (3) a mixed-methods process evaluation to assess intervention reach, fidelity, satisfaction, and dose delivered/received. Discussion Targeted and sustainable interventions are needed to promote optimal health in rural AI communities. If effective, this intervention will reduce intake of SSBs and the purchase of unhealthy foods; increase the purchase of healthy foods; and improve healthy food budgeting and cooking skills among AIs with type 2 diabetes – a population at high risk of poor health outcomes. This work will help inform future health promotion efforts in resource-limited settings. Trial registration This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on October 9, 2018 with Identifier NCT03699709.


Author(s):  
Zarko Y. Kalamov ◽  
Marco Runkel

AbstractIf an individual’s health costs are U-shaped in weight with a minimum at some healthy level and if the individual has both self-control problems and rational motives for over- or underweight, the optimal paternalistic tax on calorie intake mitigates the individual’s weight problem (intensive margin), but does not induce the individual to choose healthy weight (extensive margin). Implementing healthy weight by a calorie tax is not only inferior to paternalistic taxation, but may even be worse than not taxing the individual at all. With heterogeneous individuals, the optimal uniform paternalistic tax may have the negative side effect of reducing calorie intake of the under- and normal weights. We confirm these theoretical insights by an empirical calibration to US adults.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-189
Author(s):  
Minjung Kwon ◽  
Youngjee Han

We investigated how love versus lust influences an individual's self-control behavior. We anticipated that individuals primed with love would show a higher degree of self-control than those primed with lust. In Experiment 1 (N = 236 participants), we examined how a hypothetical choice between a healthy and an unhealthy food was influenced by priming with love or lust, and found that participants were more likely to prefer a healthy option when primed with love than when primed with lust. In Experiment 2 (N = 94 participants), we examined our hypothesis with the actual consumption of an unhealthy food, and found that people consumed more of an unhealthy food when primed with lust. Our findings not only contribute to the understanding of love and lust but also broaden the horizons of research on variables that influence self-control.


2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 789-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleen Gillebaart ◽  
Iris K. Schneider ◽  
Denise T. D. De Ridder

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0259521
Author(s):  
Gitta van den Enden ◽  
Kelly Geyskens

Every day, people make many food decisions without thinking, repeatedly falling for the unhealthy option instead of the healthy option. While making these mindless decisions, people often rely on heuristics. In this paper, we demonstrate that these heuristics can be exploited to nudge consumers towards healthy alternatives. Specifically, we explore how the attraction effect (i.e., adding a decoy to a choice set) can nudge people to choose a healthy snack. The results of our choice experiment indicate that adding a decoy (i.e., a less attractive food alternative) to a self-control situation (i.e., choosing between a healthy and an unhealthy food alternative) can help people maintain self-control and choose the healthy option. This mixed choice set thus nudges people towards the healthy option. Moreover, our results show differential effects of the attraction effect depending on the (un)healthiness of the products in the choice set. Specifically, the attraction effect is prominent when the choice set consists of unhealthy products only (i.e., the unhealthy choice set), but not in the choice set that consists of only healthy products (i.e., healthy choice set). Importantly, our results indicate when the attraction effect can exploit consumers’ heuristics to help them make better, healthier food choices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document