Test–retest reliability of single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters in healthy subjects

2016 ◽  
Vol 362 ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Hermsen ◽  
A. Haag ◽  
C. Duddek ◽  
K. Balkenhol ◽  
H. Bugiel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Stimulation Parameters ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Mapping of multiple muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation: absolute and relative test–retest reliability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Nazarova ◽  
Pavel Novikov ◽  
Ekaterina Ivanina ◽  
Ksenia Kozlova ◽  
Larisa Dobrynina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Reliability of single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters across eight testing sessions

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1393-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Dyke ◽  
Soyoung Kim ◽  
Georgina M. Jackson ◽  
Stephen R. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Stimulation Parameters

Test-retest Reliability of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Thérèse Forster ◽  
Moritz Limbart ◽  
Volker Seifert ◽  
Christian Senft
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Abductor Hallucis ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract BACKGROUND: Because navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly used in neurosurgical research, interpretation of its results is of utmost importance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of nTMS. METHODS: Twelve healthy participants underwent nTMS at 2 different sessions separated by 10.3 ± 9.6 days. Investigated parameters included resting motor thresholds, hotspots, and centers of gravity calculated for the first dorsal interosseous, abductor pollicis brevis, extensor digitorum, tibial anterior, and abductor hallucis muscles. RESULTS: Excellent reliability of resting motor thresholds was observed. Hotspots and centers of gravity showed moderate to excellent repeatability along the anteroposterior axis (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.54-0.89), whereas the x coordinate presented mainly poor to moderate stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.11-0.89). Movement of centers of gravity over sessions was 0.57 ± 0.32 cm, and hotspots laid 0.79 ± 0.47 cm apart. Calculation of coefficient of variation revealed high reliability of investigated parameters in upper extremities; in lower extremity muscles, high variation across sessions was observed. CONCLUSION: nTMS can be considered a reliable tool, thus opening new fields of noninvasive investigations in neurosurgery. The results presented here should be considered in the interpretation of individual nTMS results.

Effects of attention on inhibitory and facilitatory phenomena elicited by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects

2008 ◽  
Vol 186 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Conte ◽  
Daniele Belvisi ◽  
Ennio Iezzi ◽  
Francesco Mari ◽  
Maurizio Inghilleri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Paired Pulse

Test-retest reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation EEG evoked potentials

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 536-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis J. Kerwin ◽  
Corey J. Keller ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Manjari Narayan ◽  
Amit Etkin
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document