Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of 2 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1018-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emel Uzunoglu-Özyürek ◽  
Özge Erdoğan ◽  
Sevinç Aktemur Türker
Scanning ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Tufan Ozasir ◽  
Birgul Eren ◽  
Kamran Gulsahi ◽  
Mete Ungor

This study evaluated the effects of different final irrigation regimens on the dentin tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). A total of 160 single-rooted extracted mandibular premolar teeth were divided into five groups ( n = 32 each) according to the solution used in the final rinse protocol, as follows: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (group 1), 17% EDTA and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) (group 2), 7% maleic acid (MA) (group 3), 7% MA and 2% CHX (group 4), and 5.25% NaOCl (group 5). Two roots from each group were examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to visualize smear layer removal. Experimental groups were then split randomly into three subgroups ( n = 10 ) and obturated using a cold lateral condensation technique with 0.1% rhodamine B-labelled sealers [either AH Plus (group A), EndoREZ (group E), or Tech BioSealer Endo (group T)] and gutta-percha. Specimens were sectioned and observed by CLSM to evaluate the percentage and maximum depth of sealer penetration at the apical, middle, and coronal levels. Statistical comparison was performed on grouped (apical, middle, and coronal segments) and ungrouped data using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test ( p < 0.01 ). AH Plus showed the greatest tubule penetration while Tech BioSealer Endo showed the least. Resin-based sealers displayed deeper and more consistent penetration. CHX irrigation positively influenced sealer tubule penetration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Shishir Singh ◽  
Priyanka Mokashi ◽  
Jinal Shah ◽  
Padmini Chandrasekhar ◽  
GauravPrakash Kulkarni ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-115
Author(s):  
Viviane Siqueira Coronas ◽  
Natália Villa ◽  
Angela Longo do Nascimento ◽  
Pedro Henrique Marks Duarte ◽  
Ricardo Abreu da Rosa ◽  
...  

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate penetrability on dentinal tubule of a new bioceramic sealer through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). A specific fluorophore (Fluo-3) was mixed with the sealer. Forty distobuccal roots from maxillary molars were selected, and root canal preparation was carried out with Wave One Gold # 35.06 instruments. Roots were randomly assigned to 4 groups according to the filling procedures: Bioceramic/Lentulo (Sealer Plus BC); Bioceramic/EasyClean group, three activation of the sealer (3x20 s) with Easy Clean instrument; Bioceramic/Irrisonic: ultrasonic activation for 30 s; and AHplus/Lentulo: epoxy resin based sealer (AH Plus) was utilized with the same protocol as the BC/LE group. After 72 h, specimens were transversally sectioned at 2 and 7 mm from root apex and then analyzed through CLSM. Sealer penetration area on dentinal tubule was measured by Adobe Photoshop CC2018. Kruskal Wallis and Wilcoxon T tests were carried out. Penetrability results were similar for both sealers regardless of which technique was performed to activate them inside the root canal (p>0.05). It is reasonable to conclude that penetration of bioceramic and epoxy resin based sealers occurred unimpressively. The type of instrument used to activate bioceramic sealer did not affect penetrability. Fluo 3 should be recommended as the fluorophore to evaluate dentinal tubule penetration of bioceramic sealers.


Author(s):  
Alessandra Timponi Goes CRUZ ◽  
Fabiana Soares GRECCA ◽  
Lucila PIASECKI ◽  
Caroline WICHNIESKI ◽  
Vânia Portela Dietzel WESTPHALEN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document