Induced Membranes for Segmental Mandibular Reconstruction: Case Series and Technique Review

Author(s):  
Bret Waligora ◽  
John C. Neilson ◽  
Carolyn Brookes
2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752098024
Author(s):  
Jorge Ernesto Cantini Ardila ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Torres Fuentes ◽  
Giovanni Montealegre Gomez ◽  
Susana Correa ◽  
Erika Paola Gutierrez ◽  
...  

Study Design: Free fibula flaps are nowadays the gold standard for the surgical reconstruction on large mandibular defects. Malocclusion is an important complication of this type of reconstruction and many of these patients end up requiring subsequent orthognathic corrective surgery. This is a descriptive retrospective case series study. Objective: To describe the demographic data, operative techniques, corrective methods and postoperative results in the management of malocclusion following mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. Methods: This case series study included patients who underwent free fibula flap mandibular reconstructions and who that subsequently developed malocclusion requiring orthognathic corrective surgery, from June 2010 to December 2019. Panoramic X-rays, cephalometries and/or 3-D facial reconstruction CT scans were used for surgical planning to create surgical cutting guides, templates and occlusal splints in all the patients that underwent corrective orthognathic surgery. Results: There were 46 patients who underwent a free fibula flap mandibular and maxillary reconstruction at San Jose Hospital between June 2010 and December 2019 of these, 5 patients (10.9%) developed postoperative malocclusion. One case from another institution was added to this study for a total of 6 patients with malocclusion following mandibular reconstruction surgery with a fibula free flap. During the orthognathic surgery, vertical osteotomies were performed in 3 patients and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were necessary in 2 patients and L-shape in 1 patient. Osteogenic distraction was performed in 3 patients as part of their orthognathic treatment. The fixation methods were based in miniplates for 3 of the patients and lag screws for the remaining 3 patients. With this approach, all patients had an adequate occlusion correction with a 100% consolidation at their 6-month follow up. Conclusion: Malocclusion is a significant complication following mandibular reconstruction surgery that must be identified and managed. In severe cases, it requires corrective orthognathic surgery in severe cases. We have developed a protocol to avoid pitfalls during the primary reconstruction and in case an orthognathic surgery is required for malocclusion correction, preoperative planning with cutting guides and occlusal splints should be assessed, to guarantee favorable results through a reproducible technique.


2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Culié ◽  
O. Dassonville ◽  
G. Poissonnet ◽  
J.-C. Riss ◽  
J. Fernandez ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1123
Author(s):  
P.H. Luiz de Freitas ◽  
M.H. Melo da Costa ◽  
B.J. dos Santos Júnior ◽  
N. de Souza Vitorino ◽  
R. da Costa Ribeiro ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Boaz Arzi ◽  
Derek D. Cissell ◽  
Rachel E. Pollard ◽  
Frank J. M. Verstraete

Author(s):  
Marcel Fernando Miranda Batista Lima ◽  
Juan Pablo Borges Rodrigues Maricevich ◽  
Jairo Zacchê de Sá ◽  
Kelson Kawamura ◽  
Rafael Anlicoara

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1460-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achille Tarsitano ◽  
Simona Mazzoni ◽  
Riccardo Cipriani ◽  
Roberto Scotti ◽  
Claudio Marchetti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-90
Author(s):  
Syahir Hassan ◽  
Md Arad Jelon ◽  
Nur Ikram Hanim Abd Rahim ◽  
Mohammad Adzwin Yahya ◽  
Norhayati Omar

In this work, a case series consisting of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap in ameloblastic carcinoma, pathological mandibular fracture and recontouring of mandibular angle hyperplasia that were treated successfully using fast and economical in-house virtual planning and 3D-printing protocol has been presented. Pre-operatively, the design of the reconstructed mandibular model and surgical templates were carried out, with the help of two types of free software. As the next step, all designed 3D hardware tools were printed using affordable fused deposition modeling desktop 3D printer. A 3D-printed reconstructed mandibular model was used for titanium plate bending. Our findings have illustrated that it necessitates an average of 5 h 29 min per case from virtual planning stage until the 3D printing of all 3D hardware tools is completed. The average cost for 3D-printed hardware tools and titanium plate per case is only $203.42.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document