scholarly journals End-of-Life Care Pathways in Acute and Hospice Care: An Integrative Review

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 940-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane L. Phillips ◽  
Elizabeth J. Halcomb ◽  
Patricia M. Davidson
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret L. Rising ◽  
Dena S. Hassouneh ◽  
Kristin F. Lutz ◽  
Chris S. Lee ◽  
Pat Berry

The provision of optimal end-of-life care to Hispanics receiving hospice care requires familiarity with hospice-specific variables. For example, a preference for nondisclosure of terminal prognosis in some Hispanics is incongruous with traditional hospice practice. In addition, the Spanish word for hospice, “hospicio,” has negative connotations about abandonment of loved ones. Added to cultural considerations are socioeconomic considerations. Many marginalized Hispanic individuals may experience distinct challenges when enrolling in hospice due to socioeconomic hardships relating to poverty, citizenship, and lack of insurance. This systematic integrative review examines the research literature on Hispanics and hospice to report on the state of the science for this topic. Reviewed articles were identified systematically using computer research databases and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 21 reviewed articles, many are survey and low-inference qualitative designs with limited validity and trustworthiness. Most survey instruments were not validated for Spanish language or Hispanic culture. None of the qualitative studies included theoretical sampling or follow-up interviews. Few study designs considered heterogeneity within the Hispanic population. Interpreting results cautiously, there is evidence that some Hispanics find some satisfaction with hospice care in spite of cultural incongruities and socioeconomic challenges. Future research calls for intervention studies and high-inference qualitative designs to gain insight into hospice experiences and what constitutes quality hospice care from the perspectives of Hispanic subgroups. Assessing quality and designing interventions for these end-of-life cultural and socioeconomic issues will improve end-of-life care and facilitate the hospice philosophy of promoting emotional growth at end of life.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Hinson ◽  
Aaron J. Goldsmith ◽  
Joseph Murray

This article addresses the unique roles of social work and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in end-of-life and hospice care settings. The four levels of hospice care are explained. Suggested social work and SLP interventions for end-of-life nutrition and approaches to patient communication are offered. Case studies are used to illustrate the specialized roles that social work and SLP have in end-of-life care settings.


2021 ◽  
pp. 082585972110220
Author(s):  
Gwen Levitt

There are a small number of articles in the literature discussing palliative and end-of-life care in the SMI population. Most tackle the questions relating to competency to refuse care in end-stage anorexia or terminal medical conditions. This is a case review of a 55 year old patient with a complex psychiatric and medical history, who despite extensive treatment and long hospitalizations has failed to regain any ability to care for her basic needs. She has exhausted all available treatment options and her prognosis is extremely poor. The mental health community is resistant to discussing and/ or confronting the fact that such a patient faces with the need for end-of-life care directly related to chronic psychiatric illness.


Author(s):  
Sarah K Sawicki

Abstract Medicine often views hospice care as “giving up,” which results in a reduced quality of end-of-life care for many patients. By integrating a theology of the Sabbath with modern medicine, hospice becomes a sacred and valuable way to honor the dying patient in a comprehensive and holistic way. A theology of Sabbath as “Sacredness in Time” can provide the foundation for a shift in understanding hospice as a legitimate care plan, which shifts the focus from controlling and manipulating space for the body, to rest and enjoyment of time for the whole person. First, I explore vitalism and its negative effects on the institution of hospice. Second, I address the main misconceptions and biases surrounding hospice in order to establish hospice as an appropriate option for the terminally ill. Finally, I argue for a shift away from sacredness in space (as seen in vitalism) to sacredness in time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 803-809
Author(s):  
Mihir N. Patel ◽  
Jonathan M. Nicolla ◽  
Fred A.P. Friedman ◽  
Michala R. Ritz ◽  
Arif H. Kamal

Patients with advanced cancer and their families frequently encounter clinical and logistical challenges related to end-of-life care. Hospice provides interdisciplinary and holistic care to meet patients’ biomedical, psychosocial, and spiritual needs in the last phases of life. Despite increasing general acceptance and use among patients with cancer, hospice remains underused. Underuse stems from ongoing misconceptions regarding hospice and its purpose, coupled with the rapid development of novel anticancer treatments, such as immunotherapies and targeted therapies, that have changed the landscape of possibilities. Furthermore, rapid evolutions in how end-of-life care is structured and reimbursed for will affect how oncology patients will intersect with hospice care. In this review, we explore the current and future challenges to greater integration of hospice care in the care of patients with advanced cancer and propose five recommendations as part of the path forward.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S668-S668
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Luth ◽  
Teja Pristavec

Abstract End-of-life care quality (EOLCQ) gauges our success in providing quality care to dying individuals. EOLQC measures rely on reports from bereaved family members who provide care for dying loved ones, but analyses seldom account for how caregivers’ experiences influence their EOLCQ perceptions. Caregivers frequently experience burden, which is linked to poor health outcomes and may negatively bias EOLCQ reports. Individuals may also perceive caregiving benefits that can offset deleterious burden effects, but potentially encourage overly positive EOLCQ perceptions. This paper links National Study of Caregivers (2011) and National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011-2016) data, using regression analysis and a sample of 380 EOL caregivers to examine how caregiving burden and benefits perceptions shape and moderate EOLCQ reports. Caregiving burden is unrelated to EOLCQ in adjusted models. Benefits are associated with marginally greater odds of being informed about the dying person’s condition and reporting their personal care needs were met. Burden and benefits moderate these two measures. Despite benefits, low burden caregivers report they were informed about the dying person’s condition with 90% probability. Regardless of burden, high benefits caregivers report the same with 90% probability. Low burden and benefits caregivers report met care needs with 90% probability. High burden and benefits caregivers have 90% probability of such reports. Given these reports are used in formal hospice care evaluations by CMS, additional research should explore why caregiving burden and benefit are associated with some EOLCQ measures and why individuals reporting high burden and benefits provide more positive EOLCQ appraisals.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeko (Seiko) Izumi ◽  
Hiroko Nagae ◽  
Chihoko Sakurai ◽  
Emiko Imamura

Despite increasing interests and urgent needs for quality end-of-life care, there is no exact definition of what is the interval referred to as end of life or what end-of-life care is. The purpose of this article is to report our examination of terms related to end-of-life care and define end-of-life care from nursing ethics perspectives. Current terms related to end-of-life care, such as terminal care, hospice care, and palliative care, are based on a medical model and are restrictive in terms of diagnosis and prognosis. Using codes of ethics for nurses as a framework, we attempt to identify people to whom nurses are responsible to provide end-of-life care and develop a definition of end-of-life care that is more inclusive and applicable to a broader range of people who would benefit from end-of-life care by nurses and other health-care providers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document