scholarly journals Development and Validation of the General Module of the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases and Its Comparison with SF-36

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chonghua Wan ◽  
Xin Tu ◽  
Susan Messing ◽  
Xiaomei Li ◽  
Zheng Yang ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chonghua Wan ◽  
Zheng Yang ◽  
Qiong Meng ◽  
Changyong Feng ◽  
Hongyue Wang ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0206280
Author(s):  
Peng Quan ◽  
Lei Yu ◽  
Zheng Yang ◽  
Pingguang Lei ◽  
Chonghua Wan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiongling Liu ◽  
Chonghua Wan ◽  
Xiaohua Xie ◽  
Xu Liu ◽  
Xingshan Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To develop and assess the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases-Gout (QLICD-GO [V2.0]).Methods The instrument was developed using a programmatic decision-making method to combine the general module of the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases and a new specific module. The instrument was assessed by measuring the quality of life of 116 patients with gout.Results The QLICD-GO(V2.0) included 28 items from the general module of chronic diseases and 12 items in three facets from the specific module. In addition to the field of physiological function, the internal consistency reliability of other fields and dimensions of the instrument was > 0.7 and the split-half reliability was > 0.5. Three common factors were extracted from the specific module, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 57.54%. The standardized response means of the specific module and the whole instrument were 0.94 and 1.20, respectively.Conclusions The QLICD-GO(V2.0) has good reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The instrument comprehensively and objectively reflects the quality of life of patients with gout, and it can be used to assess treatment regimens developed by medical staff.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiongling Liu ◽  
Chonghua Wan ◽  
Xiaohua Xie ◽  
Xu Liu ◽  
Xingshan Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To develop and assess the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases-Gout (QLICD-GO [V2.0]).Methods: The instrument was developed using a programmatic decision-making method to combine the general module of the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases and a new specific module. The instrument was assessed by measuring the quality of life of 116 patients with gout. Results: The QLICD-GO(V2.0) included 28 items from the general module of chronic diseases and 12 items in three facets from the specific module. In addition to the field of physiological function, the internal consistency reliability of other fields and dimensions of the instrument was >0.7 and the split-half reliability was >0.5. Three common factors were extracted from the specific module, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 57.54%. The standardized response means of the specific module and the whole instrument were 0.94 and 1.20, respectively. Conclusions: The QLICD-GO(V2.0) has good reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The instrument comprehensively and objectively reflects the quality of life of patients with gout, and it can be used to assess treatment regimens developed by medical staff.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyan Pan ◽  
Zheng Yang ◽  
Chonghua Wan ◽  
Jinghao Ruan ◽  
Bin Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To develop a quality of life (QOL) instrument specific to chronic pulmonary heart disease (CPHD) and to evaluate its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Methods: Under the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases (QLICD) system, the QLICD-CPHD (V2.0) was developed and used to measure the QOL of 184 patients with CPHD. Data were analyzed by statistical description, linear correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and paired t-test. Results: The QLICD-CPHD (V2.0) consisted of 44 items, including 28 in the general module and 16 in the specific module. The Cronbach’s α coefficients of four domains in the general module and the specific module were greater than 0.7, and the split-half reliability coefficients were between 0.6 and 0.8, indicating that the instrument has good reliability. The instrument showed good validity as the correlation coefficients among items of the same domain were significantly higher than those among items of different domains. Correlation coefficients r between the corresponding domains of SF-36 and QLICD-CPHD were between 0.26 and 0.60, which suggests that QLICD-CPHD has moderate criterion validity. Paired t-tests of scores of patients before and after treatment showed significant differences in the overall score, scores of general module domains except social role, and scores of the specific module. Standardized response means were greater than 0.2, suggesting that the instrument had moderate responsiveness and was sensitive to changes in the patients’ QOL. Conclusion: The QLICD-CPHD (V2.0) has good reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The instrument can be used to evaluate the QOL of CPHD patients.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chonghua Wan ◽  
Runsheng Jiang ◽  
Xin M. Tu ◽  
Wan Tang ◽  
Jiahua Pan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document