A Comparison of the Birth Characteristics of Idiopathic Toe Walking and Toe Walking Gait Due to Medical Reasons

2016 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 290-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Baber ◽  
Joanne Michalitsis ◽  
Michael Fahey ◽  
Barry Rawicki ◽  
Terry Haines ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cylie Williams ◽  
Paul Tinley ◽  
Michael Curtin ◽  
Sharon Nielsen

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cylie M. Williams ◽  
Paul Tinley ◽  
Michael Curtin ◽  
Suzanne Wakefield ◽  
Sharon Nielsen

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Martín-Casas ◽  
Alfonso Meneses-Monroy ◽  
Juan Vicente Beneit-Montesinos ◽  
María de los Ángeles Atín-Arratibel ◽  
Gustavo Plaza-Manzano ◽  
...  

Background: Idiopathic toe-walking (ITW) gait may present in children older than 3 years and in the absence of a medical condition known to cause or be associated with toe-walking gait. It is unknown how this gait type changes pressure distribution in the growing foot. We sought to determine whether children with ITW gait exhibit different plantar pressures and temporal gait features than typically developing children. Methods: Children aged 3 to 6 years were recruited who had either a typical heel-toe gait pattern or a diagnosis of ITW. The ITW diagnosis was reported by the parent/caregiver and confirmed through history and physical examination. Temporal gait measures, peak pressures, and impulse percentages were measured. A minimum of ten unshod footprints were collected. Data were compared with unpaired t tests. Results: The study included 40 children with typical gait and 56 with ITW gait. The ITW group displayed lower peak pressures at the hallux, midfoot, and hindfoot (P < .05) and higher and lower pressure impulse percentages at the forefoot (P < .001) and hindfoot (P < .001), respectively. The ITW group spent a higher percentage of contact time at all areas of the forefoot and less at the midfoot and rearfoot (P < .05). There were no significant differences in total step duration and foot progression angle between groups (P > .05). Conclusions: There were differences in pressure distributions between groups. Understanding these differences may help us better understand the compensations or potential long-term impact that ITW gait may have on a young child's foot. Podiatric physicians may also consider the use of this equipment in the clinical setting to measure outcomes after treatment for ITW.


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 374-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cylie Williams ◽  
Paul D. Tinley ◽  
Michael Curtin ◽  
Sharon Nielsen

Background: Idiopathic toe-walking (ITW) in children has been associated with ankle equinus. Although equinus has been linked to foot deformity in adults, there has been limited investigation of the impact of equinus on structural foot change in children. We used the weightbearing lunge test and the six-item version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) to evaluate the weightbearing foot and ankle measures of children with an ITW gait and to compare these with their age-matched peers. Methods: Sixty 4-to 6-year-old children were grouped into ITW (n = 30) and non–toe-walking (n = 30) cohorts using a validated ITW tool. Ankle range of motion was determined with weightbearing lunge tests. The FPI-6 was calculated during weightbearing stance. Results: There was a highly significant difference in the weightbearing lunge test measures between the ITW cohort and the non–toe-walking cohort. The FPI-6 comparison was not significant. The straight-leg lunge test had a statistically significant relationship with the FPI-6 in the ITW cohort. Conclusion: Children with an ITW gait demonstrated reduced flexibility at the ankle joint but similar weightbearing foot posture compared with non–toe-walking children, showing that for children 4 to 8 years old, an ITW gait affects the available ankle dorsiflexion but seems to have a limited effect on weightbearing foot posture as measured by the FPI-6. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 103(5): 374–379, 2013)


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1017-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cylie M. Williams ◽  
Paul Tinley ◽  
Michael Curtin ◽  
Sharon Nielsen

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. e140-e141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cylie M Williams ◽  
Paul Tinley ◽  
Michael Curtin ◽  
Sharon Nielsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document