Outcome and staging evaluation in malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary in children and adolescents: an intergroup study

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Billmire ◽  
C Vinocur ◽  
F Rescorla ◽  
B Cushing ◽  
W London ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1203-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Furqan Shaikh ◽  
John W. Cullen ◽  
Thomas A. Olson ◽  
Farzana Pashankar ◽  
Marcio H. Malogolowkin ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate whether event-free survival (EFS) can be maintained among children and adolescents with intermediate-risk (IR) malignant germ cell tumors (MGCT) if the administration of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (PEb) is reduced from four to three cycles and compressed from 5 to 3 days per cycle. Patients and Methods In a phase 3, single-arm trial, patients with IR MGCT (stage II-IV testicular, II-III ovarian, I-II extragonadal, or stage I gonadal tumors with subsequent recurrence) received three cycles of PEb. A parametric comparator model specified that the observed EFS rate should not be significantly < 92%. As recommended for trials that test a reduction of therapy, a one-sided P value ≤ .10 was used to indicate statistical significance. In a post hoc analysis, we also compared results to the EFS rate of comparable patients treated with four cycles of PEb in two prior studies. Results Among 210 eligible patients enrolled from 2003 to 2011, 4-year EFS (EFS4) rate was 89% (95% confidence interval, 83% to 92%), which was significantly lower than the 92% threshold of the comparison model ( P = .08). Among 181 newly diagnosed patients, the EFS4 rate was 87%, compared with 92% for 92 comparable children in the historical cohort ( P = .15). The EFS4 rate was significantly associated with stage (stage I, 100%; stage II, 92%; stage III, 85%; and stage IV, 54%; P < .001). Conclusion The EFS rate for children with IR MGCT observed after three cycles of PEb was less than that of a prespecified parametric model, particularly for patients with higher-stage tumors. These data do not support a reduction in the number of cycles of PEb from four to three. However, further investigation of a reduction in the number of cycles for patients with lower-stage tumors is warranted.


Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 620-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri L. Spunt ◽  
Michael F. Walsh ◽  
Matthew J. Krasin ◽  
Kathleen J. Helton ◽  
Catherine A. Billups ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1890-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett M. Brodeur ◽  
Cathryn B. Howarth ◽  
Charles B. Pratt ◽  
Josefina Caces ◽  
H. Omar Hustu

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 396-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Fonseca ◽  
Caihong Xia ◽  
Armando J. Lorenzo ◽  
Mark Krailo ◽  
Thomas A. Olson ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To investigate relapse detection methods among children and adolescents with nongerminomatous malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs) and to determine whether tumor markers alone might be sufficient for surveillance. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients enrolled in a phase III, single-arm trial for low-risk and intermediate-risk MGCTs. The method used to detect relapse was assessed based on case report forms, tumor markers, imaging, and pathology reports. Relapses were classified into one of two categories on the basis of whether they were (1) detectable by tumor marker elevation or (2) not detectable by tumor markers. RESULTS A total of 302 patients were enrolled, and 284 patients had complete data for review. Seven patients had normal tumor markers at initial diagnosis, and none experienced a relapse. At a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 48 patients (16.9%) had experienced a relapse. After central review, 47 of 48 relapses (98%) were detected by tumor marker elevation. Of the 47 patients, 16 (33.3%) had abnormal tumor markers with normal/unknown imaging, 31 patients (64.6%) had abnormal tumor markers with abnormal imaging, and one patient (2.1%) had abnormal imaging with unknown marker levels at relapse. CONCLUSION Tumor marker elevation is a highly sensitive method of relapse surveillance, at least among children and adolescents with tumor marker elevation at initial diagnosis. Eliminating exposure to imaging with ionizing radiation may enhance the safety of relapse surveillance in patients treated for MGCT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document