Nonoperative management of periappendiceal abscess in children: A comparison of antibiotics alone versus antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yachao Zhang ◽  
Gustavo Stringel ◽  
Ian Bezahler ◽  
Shekher Maddineni
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. e42-e44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriakos Psarras ◽  
Minas E. Baltatzis ◽  
Nikolaos Symeonidis ◽  
Efstathios T. Pavlidis ◽  
Aikaterini Miha ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Kanno ◽  
Yusuke Hirakawa ◽  
Masafumi Yasunaga ◽  
Ryuta Midorikawa ◽  
Shinichi Taniwaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pancreatic trauma is a rare condition with a wide presentation, ranging from hematoma or laceration without main pancreatic duct involvement, to massive destruction of the pancreatic head. The optimal diagnosis of pancreatic trauma and its management approaches are still under debate. The East Association of Surgery for Trauma (EAST) guidelines recommend operative management for high-grade pancreatic trauma; however, several reports have reported successful outcomes with nonoperative management (NOM) for grade III/IV pancreatic injuries. Herein, we report a case of grade IV pancreatic injury that was nonoperatively managed through endoscopic and percutaneous drainage. Case presentation A 47-year-old Japanese man was stabbed in the back with a knife; upon blood examination, both serum amylase and lipase levels were within normal limits. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed extravasation of the contrast medium around the pancreatic head and a hematoma behind the pancreas. Abdominal arterial angiography revealed a pseudo aneurysm in the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery, as well as extravasation of the contrast medium in that artery; coil embolization was thus performed. On day 12, CT revealed a wedge-shaped, low-density area in the pancreatic head, as well as consecutive pseudocysts behind the pancreas; thereafter, percutaneous drainage was performed via the stab wound. On day 22, contrast radiography through the percutaneous drain revealed the proximal and distal parts of the main pancreatic duct. The injury was thus diagnosed as a grade IV pancreatic injury based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma guidelines. On day 26, an endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube was inserted across the disruption; on day 38, contrast-enhanced CT showed a marked reduction in the fluid collection. Finally, on day 61, the patient was discharged. Conclusions Although the EAST guidelines recommend operative treatment for high-grade pancreatic trauma, NOM with appropriate drainage by endoscopic and/or percutaneous approaches may be a promising treatment for grade III or IV trauma.


2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 936-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Oliak ◽  
Dan Yamini ◽  
Vikram M. Udani ◽  
Roger J. Lewis ◽  
Tracey Arnell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document