Pediatric: Nurse-Placed Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in an Interventional Radiology Setting Improves Outcomes

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Beverly Paul ◽  
Carol Czajka
Author(s):  
I. Aljediea ◽  
M. Alshehri ◽  
K. Alenazi ◽  
A. Memesh ◽  
M. Fleet

Abstract Purpose We conducted this study to review our local experience of performing peripherally inserted central catheters by interventional radiology technologists. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of peripherally inserted central catheters performed by interventional radiology technologists. These procedures were performed using ultrasound guidance for venous puncture and fluoroscopy or electrocardiography guidance followed by chest X-ray to confirm tip location. Results We reviewed all peripherally inserted central catheters performed in interventional radiology between May 2017 and July 2020. The review process included the success rate, number of venous puncture attempts, method of guidance, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, catheter duration to removal, and complications. Conclusion Interventional radiology technologists can perform peripherally inserted central catheters safely with high success rate. Extending interventional radiology technologists' role to perform peripherally inserted central catheters allow interventional radiologists to do more complex procedures. This enhances the workflow, increases the interventional radiology team efficiency, and improves the waiting time.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Naylor

Abstract Catheter malposition is a common occurrence with the insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) in Santa Rosa, California, trialed and implemented a new tip location device to evaluate whether malposition rates could be reduced. This article compares 6 months of data. Three of these months were compiled before using the tip locator device. The right atrial malposition rate remained consistent at 18% with or without the use of the tip locator device. All other malpositions were 13.4% without use of the tip locator. The overall malposition rate was 2.5% with the use of the tip locator device. By using this technology, supply and labor costs were reduced, as were referrals to interventional radiology and delays in treatment. Overall staff satisfaction improved.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-413
Author(s):  
Santokh S. Dhillon ◽  
Bairbre Connolly ◽  
Omid Shearkhani ◽  
Mary Brown ◽  
Robert Hamilton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document