The paradox of cultivating community resiliency: Re-agrarianisation and De-peasantisation of indigenous farmers in Taiwan

2021 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 96-105
Author(s):  
Shu-Mei Huang ◽  
Hu Che-Hao (Valagas Gadeljeman) ◽  
Yu-Hsin Chang
Keyword(s):  
Peace Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-269
Author(s):  
Tiffany Easthom
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Robert M. Patton ◽  
Chad A. Steed ◽  
Chris G. Stahl ◽  
Jim N. Treadwell

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Cathryn Windsor ◽  
Andrew J. Hampton ◽  
James Grayson Cupit ◽  
Alistair James Windsor

1999 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solange Nadeau ◽  
Bruce Shindler ◽  
Christina Kakoyannis

In both Canada and the United States, there has been a growing interest in the sustainability of forests and forest communities. Policy makers and scientists have attempted to understand how forest management practices can enhance or harm the future of such communities. Although many studies have historically used economic indicators as measures of community stability, more recently researchers have demonstrated that the relationship between communities and forests goes far beyond simple economic dependency. Thus, recent frameworks for assessing forest communities have also addressed the need for broader social and institutional components. In this article, we briefly review three of these recent concepts — community capacity, community well-being and community resiliency — and examine what each of these terms has to contribute to the assessment of forest communities. Key words: forest community, community stability, community capacity, community well-being, community resilience


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document