Risk of suprascapular nerve injury during glenoid baseplate fixation for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study

Author(s):  
Danica D. Vance ◽  
Jeffrey A. O'Donnell ◽  
Edward L. Baldwin ◽  
Jonathan W. Cheah ◽  
Gregory Pereira ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110329
Author(s):  
Therese E Parr ◽  
Jennifer K Anderson ◽  
Alan M. Marionneaux ◽  
John M Tokish ◽  
Stefan J Tolan ◽  
...  

Background In a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the altered glenohumeral joint center of rotation subjects the glenoid baseplate to increased shear forces and potential loosening. Methods This study examined glenoid baseplate micromotion and initial fixation strength with the application of direct shear force in a Sawbone model. The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems examined were the DJO Reverse® Shoulder Prosthesis, the Exactech Equinoxe® Reverse System, and the Tornier AequalisTM Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis. Specimens were cyclically tested with increasing shear loads until 150 µm of displacement between the implant and glenoid was achieved, and subsequently until failure, classified as either 1 cm of implant/glenoid displacement or fracture. Results The average load withstood for the 150 µm threshold for DJO, Tornier, and Exactech was 460 ± 88 N, 525 ± 100 N, and 585 ± 160 N, respectively. The average total load at device failure for DJO, Tornier, and Exactech was 980 ± 260 N, 1260 ± 120 N, and 1350 ± 230 N, respectively. Discussion The Exactech implant design trended toward requiring more load to induce micromotion at each threshold and to induce device failure, most commonly seen as inferior screw pull out. This study proposes design features that may enhance fixation and suggests little risk of initial micromotion or failure during initial post-operative recovery.


JBJS Reviews ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. e7-e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Rojas ◽  
Kyubo Choi ◽  
Jacob Joseph ◽  
Uma Srikumaran ◽  
Edward G. McFarland

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Lenoir ◽  
Louis Dagneaux ◽  
François Canovas ◽  
Thomas Waitzenegger ◽  
Thuy Trang Pham ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 2042-2049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Leschinger ◽  
Michael Hackl ◽  
Eduard Buess ◽  
Sebastian Lappen ◽  
Martin Scaal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Li ◽  
Junlin Zhou ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Dacun Li ◽  
Wentong Zhang

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) anatomical relationship between the suprascapular nerve and scapula, and the method of protecting the suprascapular nerve in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) Methods In the present study, 12 fresh adult cadaver shoulder specimens were dissected. X-ray and computed tomography (CT) were used to investigate the 3D scapular and suprascapular nerve images. Results The results revealed that the best fitting baseplate diameter was 24.73 ± 1.56 mm. Furthermore, the baseplate diameter correlated with the glenoid cavity width. After the osteotomy, a simulated screw placement on the baseplate was performed. The dangerous area for the posterior screw placement was at the angle between the upper edge and transverse axis exceeding 38° and between the lower edge and transverse axis exceeding 76°. The distance between the nearest point of the nerve and osteotomy plane was 15.38 ± 2.02 mm, and the angle between the projection point of the nearest point and transverse axis was 27.33 ± 7.96°, which was the dangerous area for retractor placement. The suitable angle between the superior screw and longitudinal axis was 21.67 ± 13.27°, and the suitable superior screw length was 34.66 ± 2.41 mm. Conclusion In RTSA, the baseplate size correlates with the glenoid cavity width. The relationship between the screw and suprascapular nerve and retractor placement position should be carefully considered to avoid damaging the suprascapular nerve.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document