Fragment size distributions in brittle deformed rocks.

2021 ◽  
pp. 104496
Author(s):  
Alison Ord ◽  
Thomas Blenkinsop ◽  
Bruce Hobbs
2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 789-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Rentenier ◽  
P Moretto-Capelle ◽  
D Bordenave-Montesquieu ◽  
A Bordenave-Montesquieu

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel S. Iliev ◽  
Falk K. Wittel ◽  
Hans J. Herrmann

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEE BARRON ◽  
MARTIN L. SMITH ◽  
KEITH PRISBREY

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 576-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winfried Straub ◽  
Klaus Dieter Beheng ◽  
Axel Seifert ◽  
Jan Schlottke ◽  
Bernhard Weigand

Abstract Results of numerically investigated binary collisions of 32 drop pairs presented in Part I of this study are used to parameterize coalescence efficiencies and size distributions of breakup fragments of large raindrops. In contrast to the well-known results of Low and List, it is shown that coalescence efficiencies Ec can be described best by means of the Weber number We yielding Ec = exp(−1.15We). The fragment size distributions gained from our numerical investigations were parameterized by fitting normal, lognormal, and delta distributions and relating the parameters of the distribution functions to physical quantities relevant for the breakup event. Thus, this parameterization has formally a substantial similarity to the one of Low and List, although no reference is made to breakup modes such as filament, disk, and sheet. Additionally, mass conservation is guaranteed in the present approach. The parameterizations from Low and List, as well as the new parameterizations, are applied to compute a stationary size distribution (SSD) from solving the kinetic coagulation–breakup equation until a time-independent state is reached. Although with the parameterizations of Low and List, the SSD shows an often-reported three-peak structure, with the new parameterizations the second peak vanishes completely.


2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (26) ◽  
pp. 261918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fenghua Zhou ◽  
Jean-François Molinari ◽  
K. T. Ramesh

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 2204-2215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland List ◽  
R. Nissen ◽  
C. Fung

Abstract Fragment size distributions, experimentally obtained for six drop pairs colliding at 50 kPa, are parameterized similarly to the 100-kPa drop pair experiments by Low and List. This information is then introduced into a box model to allow assessment of the spectra evolution and a comparison of the two datasets taken at the two pressures. The differences in breakup patterns include the following: The contributions to mass transfer by breakup and coalescence are very similar at the two pressures, with larger values at lower pressure; the overall mass evolution is not particularly sensitive to pressure; and disk breakup plays an “erratic” role. The situation for the number concentration, however, is totally different and develops gradually. At 50 kPa there is also no three-peak equilibrium developing as for 100 kPa. The times to reach equilibrium are ∼12 h. Note that the box model does not include accretion of cloud droplets—which may well be more important than growth by accretion of fragments. Application of the new parameterization is not beneficial for low rain rates, but it is strongly recommended for large rain rates (>50 mm h−1).


2014 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 054307 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Qian ◽  
X. Ma ◽  
Z. Chen ◽  
B. Li ◽  
D. C. Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document