scholarly journals PSS12 Nepafenac for the Reduction in Risk of Post-Operative Macular Oedema Associated With Cataract Surgery in Diabetic Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Estimation for Scotland

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. A570
Author(s):  
D. Jackson ◽  
R. Fisher ◽  
F. Latif
2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Nardi ◽  

Nepafenac ophthalmic suspension is a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) approved in the US and Europe for prevention and treatment of post-operative pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery, and recently approved in Europe for reduction in risk of post-operative macular oedema associated with cataract surgery in diabetic patients. Unlike conventional NSAIDs, nepafenac is a prodrug that is uncharged and this results in great corneal permeability. Experimental studies on nepafenac demonstrated enhanced permeability compared with other NSAIDs, and rapid bioactivation to amfenac by intraocular hydrolases within ocular tissues including ciliary body epithelium, retina, choroid and cornea, which results in targeted delivery of active drug to anterior and posterior segments. Furthermore, these study results have been confirmed in clinical trials. Nepafenac may have prolonged activity in vascularised tissues of the eye because bioconversion is targeted to the iris/ciliary body, and to a greater extent the retina and choroid. Nepafenac and amfenac are potent inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzyme isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. Topical nepafenac penetrated into the posterior segment in a rabbit model of concanavalin-A induced retinal inflammation, where it diminished vitreous protein and prostaglandin E2concentrations and reduced breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier. Other NSAIDs, including ketorolac, failed to reduce the increase of these inflammatory markers in the same study. A randomised clinical study showed that based on retinal thickening and vision, treatment with nepafenac beginning pre-surgery and used for up to 90 days post-cataract surgery is effective in preventing macular oedema and associated loss of visual acuity in diabetic patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Boscia ◽  
Ermete Giancipoli ◽  
Giuseppe D’Amico Ricci ◽  
Antonio Pinna

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4/5) ◽  
pp. 323-331
Author(s):  
Mohsen pakdaman ◽  
Raheleh akbari ◽  
Hamid reza Dehghan ◽  
Asra Asgharzadeh ◽  
Mahdieh Namayandeh

PurposeFor years, traditional techniques have been used for diabetes treatment. There are two major types of insulin: insulin analogs and regular insulin. Insulin analogs are similar to regular insulin and lead to changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. The purpose of the present research was to determine the cost-effectiveness of insulin analogs versus regular insulin for diabetes control in Yazd Diabetes Center in 2017.Design/methodology/approachIn this descriptive–analytical research, the cost-effectiveness index was used to compare insulin analogs and regular insulin (pen/vial) for treatment of diabetes. Data were analyzed in the TreeAge Software and a decision tree was constructed. A 10% discount rate was used for ICER sensitivity analysis. Cost-effectiveness was examined from a provider's perspective.FindingsQALY was calculated to be 0.2 for diabetic patients using insulin analogs and 0.05 for those using regular insulin. The average cost was $3.228 for analog users and $1.826 for regular insulin users. An ICER of $0.093506/QALY was obtained. The present findings suggest that insulin analogs are more cost-effective than regular insulin.Originality/valueThis study was conducted using a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate insulin analogs versus regular insulin in controlling diabetes. The results of study are helpful to the government to allocate more resources to apply the cost-effective method of the treatment and to protect patients with diabetes from the high cost of treatment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Jiramongkolchai ◽  
M. Lalezary ◽  
S. J. Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document