INTRODUCTION:Cataract surgery is one of the most frequent ophthalmological surgical procedures performed in children. However, clinical outcomes in younger patients are generally unpredictable. Currently, cataract surgery can be performed through the traditional phacoemulsification ultrasound probe or Femtosecond Laser (1). The aim of this study is to describe the application of Decision-oriented Health Technology Assessment (HTA) (DoHTA) to assess the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) compared to conventional cataract surgery (CCS).METHODS:To evaluate safety, costs, organizational aspects, effectiveness and technical characteristics of FLACS compared with CCS, a DoHTA method was applied (2). DoHTA is a new implementation of the European Network For HTA (EUnetHTA) Core Model®, which integrates the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). All the relevant assessment aspects of FLACS are summarized in a hierarchical decision tree by means of Key Performance Indicators (KPI), subsequently weighted through pairwise comparisons. Lastly, FLACS and CCS were ranked against lowest indicators of decision tree.RESULTS:The multidisciplinary assessment took into consideration all the aspects and recommendations about the benefits and disadvantages of FLACS compared to CCS. DoHTA results showed that FLACS surgery is safe and effective for pediatric patients. Furthermore, FLACS seems to overcome CCS with several important developments such as increased precision of anterior capsulotomy, reduced ultrasound power requirement during phacoemulsification, decreased collateral tissue damage, increased accuracy and consistency in surgical results as well as better visual outcomes. Notwithstanding such clinical improvements, FLACS is more expensive than its comparator.CONCLUSIONS:The DoHTA results integrated the evidence from the scientific literature (which is still limited) with experts judgments. Indeed, although FLACS had the highest purchase price, DoHTA results showed that FL improves the quality of cataract surgery. Based on our results and taking into consideration the positive safety and clinical effectiveness features, we conclude that FLACS may be a good alternative to CCS.
PHP306 - CAN GRADEPRO SUPPORT AND IMPROVE CHOICE OF OUTCOMES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT? REPORT ON A PILOT USE WITHIN THE EUNETHTA ASSESSMENT OF FEMTOSECOND LASER ASSISTED CATARACT SURGERY (FLACS)
