scholarly journals IP045. Endovascular Repair Leads to a Better Long-Term Quality of Life Compared With Open Surgery in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. e122
Author(s):  
Paolo Spath ◽  
GianLuca Faggioli ◽  
Antonino M. Logiacco ◽  
Giovanni Badalamenti ◽  
Rodolfo Pini ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. S17-S18
Author(s):  
Emre Gök ◽  
Mehmet Akif Onalan ◽  
Metin Onur Beyaz ◽  
Celalettin Karatepe ◽  
Bayer Cinar ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark K. Eskandari ◽  
Stephen A. Bowles ◽  
Marshall W. Webster ◽  
David L. Steed ◽  
Michel S. Makaroun ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
A. A. Karpenko ◽  
A. M. Chernyavskiy ◽  
N. R. Rakhmetov ◽  
A. A. Dyusupov ◽  
Ye. O. Masalimov ◽  
...  

We analyzed the data of surgical treatment of 225 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) obtained over a period from 1998 to 2012. Depending on the tactics and methods of surgical treatment, the patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 included 79 patients (35,2%), who underwent open surgery for AAA with therapeutic correction of combined pathology in the blood pool of the heart. Group 2 had 118 patients (52,4%), who underwent first surgical correction of the arterial bed of the heart and then open surgery for AAA. 28 patients of Group 3 (12,4 %) also underwent first surgical correction in the arterial bed area followed, however, by endovascular repair of AAA. Preliminary surgical correction of the coronary blood flow abnormalities followed by open surgery of AAA allowed to reduce the number of myocardial infarctions in the early postoperative period from 10,1 % to 1,7% and from 12,5% to 1,3% in the long-term period, to reliably reduce perioperative mortality from 10,1% to 0,8% and to improve the actuarial 5-year survival from 77,5% to 91,3%. The absence of cardiac complications after preliminary surgical correction of the coronary blood flow and endovascular repair of AAA both during early and long-term follow-up is indicative of the benefits of this tactic, especially for the elderly with multiple co-morbidities.


2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 36S-37S
Author(s):  
Niels J. Ravensbergen ◽  
Mirjam H. Mastenbroek ◽  
Michiel T. Voûte ◽  
Sanne E. Hoeks ◽  
Don Poldermans

Medicina ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Kaspars Ķīsis ◽  
Dainis Krieviņš ◽  
Karina Naškoviča ◽  
Mārcis Gediņš ◽  
Natālija Ezīte ◽  
...  

An increasing number of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms are treated using endovascular rather than open surgical techniques. The Vascular Surgery Center, P. Stradins Clinical University Hospital, has the largest worldwide experience using a new type of endoprosthesis, which fills and anchors the device in the aneurysm sac. Within the framework of a clinical trial, the quality-of-life evaluation of patients treated using this type of device was carried out. Materials and Method. A cohort study was conducted from 2008 to 2011 comparing the quality of life (QOL) of patients after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with either the new endovascular treatment method (EVAR) or open surgery (OS). Each group comprised 20 patients, and the quality-of life-evaluation was performed using the SF-36 questionnaire before operation, 1 month after operation, and 1 year after operation. Results. One month after operation, an improved QOL was documented in the EVAR group (47 [SD, 3] in the EVAR group vs. 38 [SD, 3] in the OS group, P<0.001). One year after operation, a significant improvement in QOL persisted although the difference between the groups diminished (48 [SD, 4] in the EVAR group vs. 42 [SD, 3] in the OS group, P<0.001). Conclusions. The patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent EVAR using the new sac-anchoring endoprosthesis have improved health-related quality of life compared to the patients undergoing open surgical repair. The improvement in quality of life remained slightly better in the EVAR group 1 year after operation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ebert ◽  
M. Langer ◽  
P. Uhrmeister

SummaryThe endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has generated a great deal of interest since the early 1990s, and many different devices are currently available. The procedure of endovascular repair has been evaluated in many institutions and the different devices are compared. The first results were encouraging, but complications like endoleak, dislocation or thrombosis of the graft occurred. By the available devices the stent application is only promising, if the known exclusion criteria are strictly respected. Therefore a careful preinterventional assessment of the patient by different imaging modalities is necessary. As the available results up to now are preliminary and the durability of the devices has to be controlled, multicenter studies are required to improve the devices and observe their long- term success in the exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document