Rethinking sustainable land management planning: Understanding the social and economic drivers of farmer decision-making in Africa

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 684-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Emerton ◽  
Katherine A. Snyder
2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Street ◽  
Abbott Simon ◽  
Ladyman Marty ◽  
Anderson-Mayes Ann-Marie

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara A. Forbis ◽  
Louis Provencher ◽  
Leonardo Frid ◽  
Gary Medlyn

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1781 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bardos ◽  
Hayley Thomas ◽  
Jonathan Smith ◽  
Nicola Harries ◽  
Frank Evans ◽  
...  

Sustainability considerations have become widely recognised in contaminated land management and are now accepted as an important component of remediation planning and implementation around the world. The Sustainable Remediation Forum for the UK (SuRF-UK) published guidance on sustainability criteria for consideration in drawing up (or framing) assessments, organised across 15 “headline” categories, five for the environment element of sustainability, five for the social, and five for the economic. This paper describes how the SuRF-UK indicator guidance was developed, and the rationale behind its structure and approach. It describes its use in remediation option appraisal in the UK, and reviews the international papers that have applied or reviewed it. It then reviews the lessons learned from its initial use and the opinions and findings of international commentators, and concludes with recommendations on how the indicator categories might be further refined in the future. The key findings of this review are that the SuRF-UK framework and indicator guidance is well adopted into practice in the UK. It is widely recognised as the most appropriate mechanism to support sustainability-based decision making in contaminated land decision making. It has influenced the development of other national and international guidance and standards on sustainable remediation. However, there is room for some fine tuning of approach based on the lessons learned during its application.


1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bruce Bare ◽  
Guillermo A. Mendoza

Forest land management planning provides a rich environment for the use of optimization techniques that incorporate multiple criteria and operate within a soft optimization decision environment. Using de novo programming, several approaches for examining planning problems are described where the objective is not simply to optimize a given system, but to design an optimal system. Both single and multiple objective linear programming models are used to illustrate this new approach and several illustrative examples are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document