scholarly journals Corrigendum to “Treatment and outcome of 432 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in first, second and third line – Results from the prospective German TLK cohort study” [Lung Cancer 130 (2019) (April) 216–225]

Lung Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Claus-Christoph Steffens ◽  
Corinna Elender ◽  
Ulrich Hutzschenreuter ◽  
Stephanie Dille ◽  
Adrian Binninger ◽  
...  
Lung Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus-Christoph Steffens ◽  
Corinna Elender ◽  
Ulrich Hutzschenreuter ◽  
Stephanie Dille ◽  
Adrian Binninger ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 3091-3103
Author(s):  
Dylan E. O’Sullivan ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Iqra A. Syed ◽  
Daniel Moldaver ◽  
Mary Kate Shanahan ◽  
...  

The prognosis for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is poor. Real-world evidence can highlight the unmet clinical need within this population. We conducted a population-based cohort study of ES-SCLC patients diagnosed in a large Canadian province (2010–2018) using electronic medical records and administrative claims data. In all, 1941 ES-SCLC patients were included, of which 476 (25%) were recurrent cases. Median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range: 39–94) and 50.2% were men. Of the 1941 ES-SCLC patients, 29.5% received chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 17.0% chemotherapy alone, 8.7% radiotherapy alone, and 44.8% received best supportive care. Chemotherapy was initiated by 46.5%, 8.5%, and 1.4% of first-, second-, and third-line patients, with lower uptake for recurrent cases. Median survival from first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy was 7.82 months (95% CI: 7.50–8.22), 5.72 months (95% CI: 4.90–6.87), and 3.83 months (95% CI: 2.99–4.60). Among patients who received first-line therapy, the 2-year and 5-year survival was 7.3% (95% CI: 5.7–9.2) and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.8–4.5). In conclusion, initiation of first-line treatment in ES-SCLC was low with significant attrition in subsequent lines. These results underscore the need for effective front-line treatments and highlight the potential for novel therapies to improve patient outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Li ◽  
Qiaohong Bai ◽  
Yuchao Wang ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Chunhua Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Comparison of the efficacy and adverse reactions of anlotinib and nanoparticle albumin-boundpaclitaxel (Nab-P) in the treatment of third-line and above extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib and Nab-P in clinical practice. We enrolled 71 patients with ES-SCLC who received anlotinib monotherapy or Nab-P monotherapy as third-line or later-line therapy. Divided into Anlotinib group (n=35) and Nab-P group (n=36). We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AE) in the two groups. Results: Among all patients, the Nab-P group showed better overall response rate (ORR) compared with the Anlotinib group [19.4% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.193]. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two groups. The most common AEs in the Anlotinib group were liver damage, fatigue, hypertension, and hand-foot syndrome. The most common AEs in the Nab-P group were liver damage, neutropenia, fatigue, and muscle aches. There were no treatment-related deaths.Conclusions: In our real-world data analysis, patients treated with Nab-P had a better overall response rate (ORR), but no benefit of PFS or OS. Both treatment options are effective, so the choice should be based on their potential side effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document