Benthic fluxes from hypoxia-influenced Gulf of Mexico sediments: Impact on bottom water acidification

2019 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 94-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Berelson ◽  
James McManus ◽  
Silke Severmann ◽  
Nick Rollins
2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjie Wang ◽  
John Lehrter ◽  
Kanchan Maiti ◽  
Katja Fennel ◽  
Arnaud Laurent ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 2279-2294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. McCarthy ◽  
Silvia E. Newell ◽  
Stephen A. Carini ◽  
Wayne S. Gardner

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 6783-6792 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.-N. Kim ◽  
K. Lee ◽  
H. W. Bange ◽  
A. M. Macdonald

Abstract. Microbial nitrous oxide (N2O) production in the ocean is enhanced under low-oxygen (O2) conditions. This is especially important in the context of increasing hypoxia (i.e., oceanic zones with extremely reduced O2 concentrations). Here, we present a study on the interannual variation in summertime nitrous oxide (N2O) concentrations in the bottom waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico (nGOM), which is well-known as the site of the second largest seasonally occurring hypoxic zone worldwide. To this end we developed a simple model that computes bottom-water N2O concentrations with a tri-linear ΔN2O/O2 relationship based on water-column O2 concentrations, derived from summer (July) Texas–Louisiana shelf-wide hydrographic data between 1985 and 2007. ΔN2O (i.e., excess N2O) was computed including nitrification and denitrification as the major microbial production and consumption pathways of N2O. The mean modeled bottom-water N2O concentration for July in the nGOM was 14.5 ± 2.3 nmol L−1 (min: 11.0 ± 4.5 nmol L−1 in 2000 and max: 20.6 ± 11.3 nmol L−1 in 2002). The mean bottom-water N2O concentrations were significantly correlated with the areal extent of hypoxia in the nGOM. Our modeling analysis indicates that the nGOM is a persistent summer source of N2O, and nitrification is dominating N2O production in this region. Based on the ongoing increase in the areal extent of hypoxia in the nGOM, we conclude that N2O production (and its subsequent emissions) from this environmentally stressed region will probably continue to increase into the future.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. e0184350 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Eugene Turner ◽  
Nancy N. Rabalais ◽  
Dubravko Justić

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Joye ◽  
I. R. MacDonald ◽  
J. P. Montoya ◽  
M. Peccini

Abstract. Geophysical, temperature, and discrete depth-stratified geochemical data illustrate differences between an actively venting mud volcano and a relatively quiescent brine pool in the Gulf of Mexico along the continental slope. Geophysical data, including laser-line scan mosaics and sub-bottom profiles, document the dynamic nature of both environments. Temperature profiles, obtained by lowering a CTD into the brine fluid, show that the venting brine was at least 10°C warmer than the bottom water. At the brine pool, two thermoclines were observed, one directly below the brine-seawater interface and a second about one meter below the first. At the mud volcano, substantial temperature variability was observed, with the core brine temperature being either slightly (~2°C in 1997) or substantially (19°C in 1998) elevated above bottom water temperature. Geochemical samples were obtained using a device called the "brine trapper" and concentrations of dissolved gases, major ions and nutrients were determined using standard techniques. Both brines contained about four times as much salt as seawater and steep concentration gradients of dissolved ions and nutrients versus brine depth were apparent. Differences in the concentrations of calcium, magnesium and potassium between the two brine fluids suggests that the fluids are derived from different sources or that brine-sediment reactions are more important at the mud volcano than the brine pool. Substantial concentrations of methane and ammonium were observed in both brines, suggesting that fluids expelled from deep ocean brines are important sources of methane and dissolved inorganic nitrogen to the surrounding environment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (10) ◽  
pp. 8126-8144 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Wallhead ◽  
R. G. J. Bellerby ◽  
A. Silyakova ◽  
D. Slagstad ◽  
A. A. Polukhin

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Joye ◽  
I. R. MacDonald ◽  
J. P. Montoya ◽  
M. Peccini

Abstract. Geophysical, temperature, and discrete depth-stratified geochemical data illustrate differences between an actively venting mud volcano and a relatively quiescent brine pool in the Gulf of Mexico along the continental slope. Geophysical data, including laser-line scan mosaics and sub-bottom profiles, document the dynamic nature of both environments. Temperature profiles, obtained by lowering a CTD into the brine fluid, show that the venting brine was at least 10°C warmer than the bottom water. At the brine pool, thermal stratification was observed and only small differences in stratification were documented between three sampling times (1991, 1997 and 1998). In contrast, at the mud volcano, substantial temperature variability was observed, with the core brine temperature being slightly higher than bottom water (by 2°C) in 1997 but substantially higher than bottom water (by 19°C) in 1998. Detailed geochemical samples were obtained in 2002 using a device called the "brine trapper" and concentrations of dissolved gases, major ions and nutrients were determined. Both brines contained about four times as much salt as seawater and steep concentration gradients of dissolved ions and nutrients versus brine depth were apparent. Differences in the concentrations of calcium, magnesium and potassium between the two brine fluids suggest that the fluids are derived from different sources, have different dilution/mixing histories, or that brine-sediment reactions are more important at the mud volcano. Substantial concentrations of methane, ammonium, and silicate were observed in both brines, suggesting that fluids expelled from deep ocean brines are important sources of these constituents to the surrounding environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document