Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Indications and Technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-424
Author(s):  
Pierce Nunley ◽  
Kelly (Frank) Van Schouwen ◽  
Marcus Stone
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Jun Ho Lee

Objective: This study investigates the relation between shifted locations of centre of rotation (COR) at each cervical level and subsequent surgical outcomes after multilevel cervical total disc replacement (MCTDR) and identifies radiological parameter that corresponded to change of COR after MCTDR. Methods: The study included a consecutive series of 24 patients who were treated with MCTDR following diagnosis of multilevel cervical disc herniation or stenosis. Numeric rating scale (NRS), range of motion (ROM) at both C2-7 segment and TDR implanted levels, and the location of COR at TDR implanted level were evaluated at pre- and post-MCTDR. These parameters were compared between patients who experienced successful and unsuccessful pain relief.Results: The inherent CORs relatively at ventro-cranial coordinates have demonstrated significant migrations to dorso-caudal locations at each cervical levels, more prominent shifts for the successful group, after MCTDR switch. The unsuccessful group showed markedly reduced C2-7 ROM and reduced angular improvement at C2-7 as well as MCTDR level after surgery in comparison with the successful group. Postoperative C2-7 ROM was related to postoperative COR along the X-axis.Conclusions: The crucial determinants for clinical success after MCTDR, other than mere preservation of the ROM both at C2-7 and TDR implanted levels, was the restoration of COR from ventro-cranial location at degenerated cervical motion segment close to normal coordinates by posterior and inferior shifts after MCTDR. The position of COR along the X-axis after MCTDR was an important factor to determine maintenance of C2-7 RO.


Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale N. Segal ◽  
Jacob M. Wilson ◽  
Christopher Staley ◽  
S. Tim Yoon

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. S97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Steib ◽  
Jean Huppert ◽  
Thierry Dufour ◽  
Pierre Bernard ◽  
Jacques Beaurain ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Pham ◽  
Vivek A. Mehta ◽  
Alexander Tuchman ◽  
Patrick C. Hsieh

Current cervical total disc replacement (TDR) designs incorporate a variety of different biomaterials including polyethylene, stainless steel, titanium (Ti), and cobalt-chrome (CoCr). These materials are most important in their utilization as bearing surfaces which allow for articular motion at the disc space. Long-term biological effects of implanted materials include wear debris, host inflammatory immune reactions, and osteolysis resulting in implant failure. We review here the most common materials used in cervical TDR prosthetic devices, examine their bearing surfaces, describe the construction of the seven current cervical TDR devices that are approved for use in the United States, and discuss known adverse biological effects associated with long-term implantation of these materials. It is important to appreciate and understand the variety of biomaterials available in the design and construction of these prosthetics and the considerations which guide their implementation.


Author(s):  
Scott H. Kitchel ◽  
Lukas Eisermann ◽  
Alexander W.L. Turner ◽  
David Cutter ◽  
G.Bryan Cornwall

Author(s):  
Andre Jackowski ◽  
Alan McLeod ◽  
Christopher Reah ◽  
G. Bryan Cornwall ◽  
Lukas Eisermann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document