Interest of Awake Surgery for Ruptured Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations Close to Speech Areas – Surgical Note

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurore Ménissier ◽  
Antoine Petit ◽  
Bougaci Nassim ◽  
Noor Hamdan ◽  
Aurélie Dauta ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Attia Ahmed Hassan ◽  
Ali Hassan Elmokadem ◽  
Ahmed Bahaa Elden Elserwi ◽  
Mohamed Metwally Abo El Atta ◽  
Talal Ahmed Youssef Amer

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor ◽  
Rita Engenhart ◽  
Günter Layer ◽  
Andreas H. Gamroth ◽  
Berndt Wowra ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Meder ◽  
C Oppenheim ◽  
J Blustajn ◽  
F Nataf ◽  
L Merienne ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Joerg Meisel ◽  
Ulrich Mansmann ◽  
Hortenzia Alvarez ◽  
Georges Rodesch ◽  
Mario Brock ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Fernando Chico-Ponce de León ◽  
Luis Felipe Gordillo-Domínguez ◽  
Eduardo Castro-Sierra ◽  
Patrick Dhellemmes

2011 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 842-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Spetzler ◽  
Francisco A. Ponce

Object The authors propose a 3-tier classification for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The classification is based on the original 5-tier Spetzler-Martin grading system, and reflects the treatment paradigm for these lesions. The implications of this modification in the literature are explored. Methods Class A combines Grades I and II AVMs, Class B are Grade III AVMs, and Class C combines Grades IV and V AVMs. Recommended management is surgery for Class A AVMs, multimodality treatment for Class B, and observation for Class C, with exceptions to the latter including recurrent hemorrhages and progressive neurological deficits. To evaluate whether combining grades is warranted from the perspective of surgical outcomes, the 3-tier system was applied to 1476 patients from 7 surgical series in which results were stratified according to Spetzler-Martin grades. Results Pairwise comparisons of individual Spetzler-Martin grades in the series analyzed showed the fewest significant differences (p < 0.05) in outcomes between Grades I and II AVMs and between Grades IV and V AVMs. In the pooled data analysis, significant differences in outcomes were found between all grades except IV and V (p = 0.38), and the lowest relative risks were found between Grades I and II (1.066) and between Grades IV and V (1.095). Using the pooled data, the predictive accuracies for surgical outcomes of the 5-tier and 3-tier systems were equivalent (receiver operating characteristic curve area 0.711 and 0.713, respectively). Conclusions Combining Grades I and II AVMs and combining Grades IV and V AVMs is justified in part because the differences in surgical results between these respective pairs are small. The proposed 3-tier classification of AVMs offers simplification of the Spetzler-Martin system, provides a guide to treatment, and is predictive of outcome. The revised classification not only simplifies treatment recommendations; by placing patients into 3 as opposed to 5 groups, statistical power is markedly increased for series comparisons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document