scholarly journals Neural basis of distractor resistance during visual working memory maintenance

NeuroImage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 118650
Author(s):  
Petra Hermann ◽  
Béla Weiss ◽  
Balázs Knakker ◽  
Petra Madurka ◽  
Annamária Manga ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 171-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Wijeakumar ◽  
V. Magnotta ◽  
A. Buss ◽  
J. Spencer

2021 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Molly A. Erickson ◽  
Britta Hahn ◽  
John E. Kiat ◽  
Luz Maria Alliende ◽  
Steven J. Luck ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Kartik Sreenivasan ◽  
Ainsley Temudo ◽  
Vahan Babushkin

NeuroImage ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 3394-3403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiko Takahama ◽  
Satoru Miyauchi ◽  
Jun Saiki

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilja Wagner ◽  
Christian Wolf ◽  
Alexander C. Schütz

AbstractMotor adaptation maintains movement accuracy over the lifetime. Saccadic eye movements have been used successfully to study the mechanisms and neural basis of adaptation. Using behaviorally irrelevant targets, it has been shown that saccade adaptation is driven by errors only in a brief temporal interval after movement completion. However, under natural conditions, eye movements are used to extract information from behaviorally relevant objects and to guide actions manipulating these objects. In this case, the action outcome often becomes apparent only long after movement completion, outside the supposed temporal window of error evaluation. Here, we show that saccade adaptation can be driven by error signals long after the movement when using behaviorally relevant targets. Adaptation occurred when a task-relevant target appeared two seconds after the saccade, or when a retro-cue indicated which of two targets, stored in visual working memory, was task-relevant. Our results emphasize the important role of visual working memory for optimal movement control.


NeuroImage ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. S870
Author(s):  
D.S. Lee ◽  
J.S. Lee ◽  
S-K. Lee ◽  
H. Nam ◽  
S.K. Kim ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 336-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agneish Dutta ◽  
Kushal Shah ◽  
Juha Silvanto ◽  
David Soto

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie M. Beck ◽  
Timothy J. Vickery

AbstractEvidence from attentional and oculomotor capture, contingent capture, and other paradigms suggests that mechanisms supporting human visual working memory (VWM) and visual attention are intertwined. Features held in VWM bias guidance toward matching items even when those features are task irrelevant. However, the neural basis of this interaction is underspecified. Prior examinations using fMRI have primarily relied on coarse comparisons across experimental conditions that produce varying amounts of capture. To examine the neural dynamics of attentional capture on a trial-by-trial basis, we applied an oculomotor paradigm that produced discrete measures of capture. On each trial, subjects were shown a memory item, followed by a blank retention interval, then a saccade target that appeared to the left or right. On some trials, an irrelevant distractor appeared above or below fixation. Once the saccade target was fixated, subjects completed a forced-choice memory test. Critically, either the target or distractor could match the feature held in VWM. Although task irrelevant, this manipulation produced differences in behavior: participants were more likely to saccade first to an irrelevant VWM-matching distractor compared with a non-matching distractor – providing a discrete measure of capture. We replicated this finding while recording eye movements and scanning participants’ brains using fMRI. To examine the neural basis of oculomotor capture, we separately modeled the retention interval for capture and non-capture trials within the distractor-match condition. We found that frontal activity, including anterior cingulate cortex and superior frontal gyrus regions, differentially predicted subsequent oculomotor capture by a memory-matching distractor. Other regions previously implicated as involved in attentional capture by VWM-matching items showed no differential activity across capture and no-capture trials, even at a liberal threshold. Our findings demonstrate the power of trial-by-trial analyses of oculomotor capture as a means to examine the underlying relationship between VWM and attentional guidance systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document