The spatial orienting of the focus of attention in working memory makes use of inhibition: Evidence by hemispheric asymmetries in posterior alpha oscillations

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 107442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Rösner ◽  
Stefan Arnau ◽  
Isabel Skiba ◽  
Edmund Wascher ◽  
Daniel Schneider
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Hakim ◽  
Kirsten C. S. Adam ◽  
Eren Gunseli ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K. Vogel

Complex cognition relies on both on-line representations in working memory (WM), said to reside in the focus of attention, and passive off-line representations of related information. Here, we dissected the focus of attention by showing that distinct neural signals index the on-line storage of objects and sustained spatial attention. We recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) activity during two tasks that employed identical stimulus displays but varied the relative demands for object storage and spatial attention. We found distinct delay-period signatures for an attention task (which required only spatial attention) and a WM task (which invoked both spatial attention and object storage). Although both tasks required active maintenance of spatial information, only the WM task elicited robust contralateral delay activity that was sensitive to mnemonic load. Thus, we argue that the focus of attention is maintained via a collaboration between distinct processes for covert spatial orienting and object-based storage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 38-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Schneider ◽  
Anna Göddertz ◽  
Henrike Haase ◽  
Clayton Hickey ◽  
Edmund Wascher

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Hakim ◽  
Kirsten C. S. Adam ◽  
Eren Gunseli ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K. Vogel

AbstractComplex cognition relies on both online representations in working memory (WM) said to reside in thefocus of attention, and passive offline representations of related information. Here, we dissect the focus of attention by showing that distinct neural signals index the online storage of objects and sustained spatial attention. We recorded EEG activity during two tasks that employed identical stimulus displays while the relative demands for object storage and spatial attention varied. We found distinct delay-period signatures for an attention task (which only required spatial attention) and WM task (which invoked both spatial attention and object storage). Although both tasks required active maintenance of spatial information, only the WM task elicited robust contralateral delay activity that was sensitive to mnemonic load. Thus, we argue that the focus of attention is maintained via a collaboration between distinct processes for covert spatial orienting and object-based storage.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 888-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara J. Blacker ◽  
Akiko Ikkai ◽  
Balaji M. Lakshmanan ◽  
Joshua B. Ewen ◽  
Susan M. Courtney

Memory ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Janczyk ◽  
Joachim Grabowski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document