Preparation of BTA-UIO-GO nanocomposite to endow coating systems with active inhibition and passive anticorrosion performances

In this work, a nanocomposite with active and passive corrosion protection performances was synthesized through a facile method. The metal organic framework (UIO-66) was chosen as the nanocontainers to encapsulate...

Mutual synergies between reactive and active inhibitory systems of temperament in the development of children's disruptive behavior: Two longitudinal studies

Individual differences in two inhibitory temperament systems have been implicated as key in the development of early disruptive behaviors. The reactive inhibition system, behavioral inhibition (BI) entails fearfulness, shyness, timidity, and caution. The active inhibition system, or effortful control (EC) entails a capacity to deliberately suppress, modify, or regulate a predominant behavior. Lower scores in each system have been associated with more disruptive behaviors. We examined how the two systems interact, and whether one can alleviate or exacerbate risks due to the other. In two community samples (Study 1, N = 112, ages 2.5 to 4, and Study 2, N = 102, ages 2 to 6.5), we assessed early BI and EC, and future disruptive behaviors (observed disregard for rules in Study 1 and parent-rated externalizing problems in Study 2). Robustly replicated interactions revealed that for children with low BI (relatively fearless), better EC was associated with less disruptive behavior; for children with low EC, more BI was associated with less disruptive behavior. This research extends the investigation of Temperament × Temperament interactions in developmental psychology and psychopathology, and it suggests that reactive and active inhibition systems may play mutually compensatory roles. Those effects emerged after age 2.

HBV DNA is a substrate for the cGAS/STING pathway but is not sensed in infected hepatocytes

HBV chronic infection is a critical risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma. Although debated, the absence of innate immune response to HBV infection in hepatocytes is becoming the current view. However the underlying reasons are poorly understood. This study aims to define potential viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), and to elucidate whether HBV counteracts the innate pathways.The innate immune response to HBV infection was monitored by interferon-stimulated gene 54 (ISG54) mRNA, a direct downstream transcriptional target of Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF3), or IRF3 phosphorylation. The immunostimulatory potential of naked HBV DNAs or RNAs and the respective PRRs were determined upon viral nucleic acid transfection in immunocompetent cells including knockout cells lacking key molecules of innate pathways. The expression and functionality of DNA and RNA sensing pathways in primary human hepatocytes (PHH) were assessed. The inhibition of the DNA-sensing pathway by HBV was tested using IRF3 nuclear translocation assay.Our study revealed that HBV infection does not induce an innate response in infected hepatocytes, even in absence of HBV X protein. HBV relaxed-circular DNA (rcDNA) and DNA replication intermediates, but not HBV RNAs, are immunostimulatory and sensed by Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase (cGAS) and Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING). Although PHH express DNA sensors to reduced levels compared to myeloid cells, they can respond to naked HBV rcDNA. However, we show that the absence of innate response to HBV infection in hepatocytes is not due to an active inhibition of the DNA sensing pathway by the virus.HBV passively evades the innate immune response in infected hepatocytes by (i) producing non-immunostimulatory RNAs, (ii) avoiding sensing of its DNAs by cGAS/STING without active inhibition of the pathway, possibly through shielding of the viral DNAs by the capsid.Author summaryInnate immune responses are the first line of defense against viral infections. They lead to the production of antiviral factors after recognition of specific viral features by the infected cells. Here we show that HBV, a major cause of liver cirrhosis and cancer, avoids recognition by infected hepatocytes through different means. First, HBV RNAs, contrarily to other viral RNAs, are not immunostimulatory. Second, we show that naked HBV DNAs are recognized by cGAS/STING and induce an innate immune response. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this pathway is active in hepatocytes and is not inhibited by the virus. Instead, we propose that HBV DNAs are not accessible to cGAS/STING in the context of an infection. This might be due to shielding of the viral DNA by the viral capsid.

Tracking selective rehearsal and active inhibition of memory traces in directed forgetting

SummarySelectively remembering or forgetting newly encountered information is essential for goal-directed behavior. It is still an open question, however, whether intentional forgetting is an active process based on the inhibition of unwanted memory traces or whether it occurs passively through reduced recruitment of selective rehearsal [1,2]. Here we show that intentional control of memory encoding relies on both, enhanced active inhibition and decreased selective rehearsal, and that these two processes can be separated in time and space. We applied representational similarity analysis (RSA [3]) and timefrequency analysis to EEG data during an item-method directed forgetting experiment [4]. We identified neural signatures of both the intentional suppression and the voluntary upregulation of item-specific representations. Successful active forgetting was associated with a downregulation of item-specific representations in an early time window, 500ms after the instruction. This process was initiated by an increase in oscillatory alpha (8-13 Hz) power, a well-established signature of neural inhibition [5,6], in occipital brain areas. During a later time window, 1500ms after the cue, intentional forgetting was associated with reduced employment of active rehearsal processes, as reflected by an attenuated upregulation of item-specific representations as compared to intentionally encoded items. Our data show that active inhibition and selective rehearsal are two separate mechanisms whose consecutive employment allows for a voluntary control of memory formation.

Phytochemical and Antimicrobial Studies of the Crude Extracts of the Leaves of Carica papaya Linn (Pawpaw) and Psidium guajava Linn (Guava)

Psidium Guajava (Guava) and Carica Papaya leaves which have some ethnomedicinal applications were investigated. Phytochemical screening of their leaves revealed the presence of flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, steroids, tannins and glycosides. Antimicrobial screening of the crude ethanolic extracts showed activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for P. gujava on the organism was found to be 5.00 mg/ml against S. aureus, E. coli and S. faecalis, while that of C. papaya leaves is 10.00 mg/ml against S. aureus, E. coli and 8.00 mg/ml against S. faecalis respectively. C. papaya ethanolic extract showed more active inhibition against S. aureus with mean zone inhibition of 9.54 ± 0.03. P. gujava ethanolic extract has more active inhibition against E. coli with antibacterial activity with mean zone of inhibition of 10.44±0.02 and S. faecalis with mean zone of inhibition of 6.72 ± 0.01 respectively. This study showed that the leaves extract of these plants are good sources of bioactive compounds. Demonstration of antibacterial activity against the test isolates is an indication that there is possibility of sourcing alternative antibiotic substances in these plants for the production of newer antibacterial agents. These plants therefore, could be an important source of medicine for the treatment of various diseases.