Abstract
Background
Recent Cochrane Systematic Review suggested that the participation in cardiac rehabilitation is associated with approximately 20% lower cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Exercise therapy is the key component of cardiac rehabilitation programs. In recent years, innovative technologies have been introduced into the field of rehabilitation, and a typical example is the wearable cyborg Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL). The wearable cyborg HAL provides motion assistance based on detection of bioelectrical signals on the skin surface when muscle forces are generated. The lumbar-type HAL is expected to expand the therapeutic options for severe cardiac patients who have difficulty in performing usual cardiac rehabilitation programs, such as bicycle pedaling or walking.
Purpose
We aim to compare the efficacy of exercise therapy performed with motion assistance from a lumbar-type HAL versus conventional training (sit-to-stand exercise without HAL) in patients with chronic heart failure.
Methods
This clinical trial is a randomized, non-blinded, and controlled study. Twenty-eight heart failure patients (73.1±13.8 years) who have difficulty in walking at the usual walking speed of healthy subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups (HAL group or control group) with a 1:1 allocation ratio and performed sit-to stand exercise either with HAL or without HAL for 5 to 30 minutes once a day, and 6 to 10 days during the study period. The brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), isometric knee extensor strength, standing ability (30-seconds chair-stand test: CS-30), short physical performance battery (SPPB) and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) were measured before and after the completion of cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiac events such as death, re-hospitalization, myocardial infarction and worsening of angina pectoris and heart failure during 1 year after discharge were evaluated.
Results
There was no significant difference in the number of days of exercise therapy between the two groups. BNP, SPPB and 6MWD were improved in both groups. In the HAL group, the isometric knee extensor strength (0.29±0.11 vs 0.35±0.11 kgf/kg, p=0.003) significantly improved and CS-30 (5.5±5.1 vs 8.2±5.3, p=0.054) tended to improve. However, in the control group, either the isometric knee extensor strength (0.35±0.11 vs 0.36±0.14 kgf/kg, p=0.424) or CS-30 (6.0±4.3 vs 9.2±6.2, p=0.075) did not significantly change. HAL group showed significantly more improvement in the isometric knee extensor strength than control group (p=0.045). Cardiac events occurred in 20% in the HAL group and 43% in the control group.
Conclusion
The improvement in isometric knee extensor strength with the assistance from lumbar-type HAL suggests that exercise therapy using this device may be useful in chronic heart failure patients with flail or sarcopenia, a strong poor prognostic factor in these patients.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan (JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP17K09485) and funded by the ImPACT Program of the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan) (grant number 2017-PM05-03-01).
Sit-to-stand Test to Evaluate Knee Extensor Muscle Size and Strength in the Elderly: A Novel Approach
