No difference between venous and capillary blood sampling and the Minimed continuous glucose monitoring system for determining the blood glucose response to food

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 403-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison J. Wallace ◽  
Jinny A. Willis ◽  
John A. Monro ◽  
Chris M. Frampton ◽  
Duncan I. Hedderley ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A Ober ◽  
Gail E Geist

Models of type-I diabetes are well-characterized and commonly used in the preclinical evaluation of drugs and medical devices. The diabetic minipig is an excellent example of a translational model. However, chronic glucose monitoring in this species can be challenging; frequent blood sampling can be technically difficult and poorly tolerated in conscious swine. Skin-patch continuous blood glucose monitors are FDA-approved for human use and offer a potential refinement to cageside blood collection. However, this modality has not been evaluated in pigs. In this study, young adult male STZ-induced diabetic Yucatan minipigs (n = 4) and healthy York pigs (n = 4) were implanted with a 14-d skin-patch continuous glucose monitor. Readings from continuous glucose monitors were time-matched to whole blood samples, with glucose measurements performed using point-of-care blood glucose monitors, serum chemistry or both. The aims of the study were to assess if a continuous glucose monitoring system could accurately detect glucose levels in swine, and to compare the readings toboth point-of-care glucometers and serum chemistry results. We hypothesized that a continuous glucose monitoring system would accurately detect glucose levels in swine in comparison with a validated analyzer and could serve as an animal welfarerefinement for studies of diabetes. We found that the continuous glucose monitor used in this study provided an adequateadjunct for clinical management in the stable diabetic pig and a minimally invasive and inexpensive option for colony maintenanceof chronically diabetic swine.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Bing-li Liu ◽  
Guo-ping Yin ◽  
Feng-fei Li ◽  
Yun Hu ◽  
Jin-dan Wu ◽  
...  

Objective. To compare the effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aspart (NovoRapid) and lispro (Prandilin) on glycemic variations by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients within newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and metformin intensive therapy. Methods. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 110 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) above 9% was hospitalized and randomly divided into two groups: group Asp (NovoRapid group) and group Lis (Prandilin group). They all received CSII and metformin therapy. Treatments were maintained for 2-3 weeks after the glycaemic target was reached. C-peptide and insulin and fructosamine were determined. CGMS was continuously applied for 4 days after reaching the glycemic target. Results. There were no significant differences in daily dosages of insulin, fasting plasma C-P and 2 h postprandial C-P and insulin, and fructosamine at the baseline and endpoint between the groups Asp and Lis. No significant differences were seen in the 24 h mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of the MBG (SDBG), fasting blood glucose, number of glycemic excursion (NGE), and the incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found in areas under the curve (AUC) of glucose above 10.0 mmol/L or the decremental area over the curve (AOC) of glucose below 3.9 mmol/L between the two groups. Conclusions. Lispro and aspart had the similar ability to control the glycemic variations in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR-IPR-17010338.


2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena ME Ristic ◽  
Michael E Herrtage ◽  
Sabine MM Walti-Lauger ◽  
Linda A. Slater ◽  
David B. Church ◽  
...  

A continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) was evaluated in 14 cats with naturally occurring diabetes mellitus. The device measures interstitial fluid glucose continuously, by means of a sensor placed in the subcutaneous tissue. All cats tolerated the device well and a trace was obtained on 15/16 occasions. There was good correlation between the CGMS values and blood glucose concentration measured using a glucometer ( r=0.932, P<0.01). Limitations to the use of the CGMS are its working glucose range of 2.2–22.2 mmol/l (40–400 mg/dl) and the need for calibration with a blood glucose measurement at least every 12 h. When compared to a traditional blood glucose curve, the CGMS is minimally invasive, reduces the number of venepunctures necessary to assess the kinetics of insulin therapy in a patient and provides a truly continuous glucose curve.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document