Comparison of in situ cone beam computed tomography scan data with ex vivo optical scan data in the measurement of root surface area

2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-557
Author(s):  
Pengcheng Jia ◽  
Gang Yang ◽  
Wenjie Hu ◽  
Kwok-Hung Chung ◽  
Yijiao Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Root Surface Area ◽  
Computed Tomography Scan ◽  
Optical Scan ◽  
Scan Data ◽  
Tomography Scan

Utility of Immediate Postprocedural Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan in the Detection of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Complications in Pediatric Neurointerventional Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. e405-e409
Author(s):  
Melissa A. LoPresti ◽  
Jeffrey M. Treiber ◽  
Visish M. Srinivasan ◽  
Gouthami Chintalapani ◽  
Stephen R. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Computed Tomography Scan ◽  
Hemorrhagic Complications ◽  
Tomography Scan

Detection of Vertical Root Fractures in Endodontically Treated Teeth by a Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 719-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bassam Hassan ◽  
Maria Elissavet Metska ◽  
Ahmet Rifat Ozok ◽  
Paul van der Stelt ◽  
Paul Rudolf Wesselink
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Computed Tomography Scan ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Root Fractures ◽  
Tomography Scan

Diagnostic Ability of a Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan to Assess Longitudinal Root Fractures in Prosthetically Treated Teeth

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1879-1882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saulo Leonardo Sousa Melo ◽  
Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi ◽  
Murillo Abreu Jr. ◽  
Letícia Ruhland Corrêa ◽  
Marcio Corrêa
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Computed Tomography Scan ◽  
Diagnostic Ability ◽  
Root Fractures ◽  
Tomography Scan

scholarly journals Comparison of 2 root surface area measurement methods: 3-dimensional laser scanning and cone-beam computed tomography

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jintana Tasanapanont ◽  
Janya Apisariyakul ◽  
Tanapan Wattanachai ◽  
Patiyut Sriwilas ◽  
Marit Midtbø ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Root Surface Area ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Surface Area Measurement

scholarly journals Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Computed Tomography Scan Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferial Taleghani ◽  
Maryam Tehranchi ◽  
Shahryar Shahab ◽  
Zahra Zohri
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Computed Tomography Scan ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Septa ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tomography Scan ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

ABSTRACT Introduction The present study was undertaken to evaluate the anatomy of the maxillary sinus in relation to its position and the height of its septa, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods In this descriptive retrospective study, 300 CBCT images of maxillary sinuses of patients with posterior maxillary edentulism were evaluated. The maxillary sinus septa were evaluated in relation to their prevalence, height, and position; t-test and Mann–Whitney tests were used for the analysis of data. Results Sinus septa were detected in 44% of the subjects, with equal frequencies in the anterior, middle, and posterior positions. The mean height of the septa was 3.6 ± 1.56 mm. Conclusion In a population of Iranian subjects, in half of the cases, the sinus septa might be present in the anterior, middle, and posterior positions. Clinical significance In order to avoid intraoperative problems during sinus lift procedures, it is necessary to accurately evaluate the sinus, preferably with the use of CBCT. How to cite this article Taleghani F, Tehranchi M, Shahab S, Zohri Z. Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Computed Tomography Scan Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(1):11-15.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document