LOW-LEVEL LASER THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ORAL PEMPHIGUS VULGARIS: 2 CASE REPORTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. e108-e109
Author(s):  
RAQUEL RICHELIEU LIMA DE ANDRADE PONTES ◽  
JULIANA SOARES PEREIRA ◽  
ANA CAROLINE PENCHINÁ DE SOUZA ◽  
WAGNER PERERIRA COUTINHO FILHO ◽  
NANCY DE ASSIS FERREIRA ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Yousefi ◽  
Parvin Mansouri ◽  
Masoud Partovikia ◽  
Mitra Esmaili ◽  
Shima Younespour ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heleine Maria Chagas Rêgo ◽  
Natalia Cortez Gutierrez ◽  
Maria Ângela Lacerda Rangel Esper ◽  
Pedro Henrique Corazza ◽  
Carolina Da Silva Machado Martinelli ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verica Pavlic ◽  
Vesna Vujic-Aleksic ◽  
Nina Zubovic ◽  
Valentina Veselinovic

Introduction. Pemphigus vulgaris is a relatively rare, chronic, autoimmune vesiculobullous disorder characterized by formation of intraepithelial vesiculae and/or bullae in the skin and mucous membrane. Systemic steroids are considered to be the standard first-line therapy for pemphigus vulgaris. However, for patients unresponsive to standard therapy, the new treatment modalities are being sought. Low-level laser therapy has been accepted as an alternative or adjunctive treatment modality for many conditions in medicine and dentistry. Therefore, this study was aimed at presenting the effects of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and to emphasize the crucial role of dentists in early recognition and diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris. Material and Methods. The articles published until May 2013 were obtained from the Medline/PubMed online database, using following search terms and key words: ?laser therapy? and ?pemphigus vulgaris?, ?low-level laser irradiation? and ?pemphigus vulgaris?, ?lasers? and ?pemphigus vulgaris? and ?pemphigus vulgaris?. Results. Low-level laser therapy could result in immediate and significant analgesia and improved wound healing within the observation period and follow-up. Furthermore, a decrease in patients? discomfort as well as the absence of recurrence of the pemphigus vulgaris lesions has been claimed. Conclusion. Even though available literature suggests that low-level laser therapy can be efficiently used in treatment of oral pemphigus vulgaris, either independently or as a part of combined therapy approach, these results should be interpreted with caution since there are no solid evidence-based proofs to provide the guidelines for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with low-level laser therapy. Therefore, further long-term randomized controlled clinical studies are necessary in order to give any solid recommendations on the use of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1103-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Maria Minicucci ◽  
Hélio Amante Miot ◽  
Silvia Regina Catharino Sartori Barraviera ◽  
Luciana Almeida-Lopes

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo Fontana ◽  
Letícia Maria Ramos Zanchetta ◽  
Letícia Fernandes Sobreira Parreira ◽  
Giovanna Rosa Degasperi ◽  
Karina Teixeira Villalpando ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
VARSHA PALLED ◽  
DR. JITENDRA RAO ◽  
DR. RAGHUWAR DAYAL SINGH ◽  
DR. SHUCHI TRIPATHI ◽  
DR. KALPANA SINGH ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) improves the healing of the implant surgical site with clinical and biochemical parameters.Thirty patients with an edentulous space spanning a single tooth were selected. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups - the control group and the test group. The test group received laser energy at a power of 2J/cm 2 with a total of 4-6J energy over each implant. Clinical parameters (Implant Stability Quotient, probing index, modified sulcus bleeding index)and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were assessed at baseline and follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months).The test group showed significantly higher implant stability quotient compared to thecontrol group at 2 weeks(57.93±3.95 and 35.67±3.08; p<0.01) and 3months(58.86±3.75 and 67.06±3.78; p<0.01). A significant rise in OPG levels of the test group(686.30±125.36pg/ml at baseline and 784.25±108.30pg/ml at 3months;p<0.01) was seen contrary to significant decline in the control group (839.50±249.08pg/ml at baseline,415.30±78.39pg/ml at 3months;p<0.01). Within the limitations of the study, the study suggests that the healing of peri-implant hard and soft tissues may be enhanced with the use of LLLT as an explicit modality during the post-operative period.


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Esteves Pinto Faria ◽  
Astrid Temprano ◽  
Fábio Piva ◽  
Eduardo Sant'ana ◽  
Dênis Pimenta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document