Single-sided deafness: Bone conduction devices or cochlear implantation? A systematic review with meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Mariana Donato ◽  
Ricardo Santos ◽  
Filipe Correia ◽  
Pedro Escada
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. e1004-e1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan A. Levy ◽  
Joshua A. Lee ◽  
Shaun A. Nguyen ◽  
Theodore R. McRackan ◽  
Ted A. Meyer ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 019459982110677
Author(s):  
Firas Sbeih ◽  
Malek H. Bouzaher ◽  
Swathi Appachi ◽  
Seth Schwartz ◽  
Michael S. Cohen ◽  
...  

Objective To systematically review the literature to determine safety of cochlear implantation in pediatric patients 12 months and younger. Data Source Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched from inception to March 20, 2021. Review Methods Studies that involved patients 12 months and younger with report of intraoperative or postoperative complication outcomes were included. Studies selected were reviewed for complications, explants, readmissions, and prolonged hospitalizations. Two independent reviewers screened all studies that were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies included were assessed for quality and risk of bias. Results The literature search yielded 269 studies, of which 53 studies underwent full-text screening, and 18 studies were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 449 patients and 625 cochlear implants were assessed. Across all included studies, major complications were noted in 3.1% of patients (95% CI, 0.8-7.1) and 2.3% of cochlear implantations (95% CI, 0.6-5.2), whereas minor complications were noted in 2.4% of patients (95% CI, 0.4-6.0) and 1.8% of cochlear implantations (95% CI, 0.4-4.3). There were no anesthetic complications reported across all included studies. Conclusion The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that cochlear implantation in patients 12 months and younger is safe with similar rates of complications to older cohorts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 632-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne W. Wendrich ◽  
Tiuri E. Kroese ◽  
Jeroen P. M. Peters ◽  
Guido Cattani ◽  
Wilko Grolman

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 069-075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cabral Junior ◽  
Mariana Pinna ◽  
Ricardo Alves ◽  
Andrea Malerbi ◽  
Ricardo Bento

Introduction Current data show that binaural hearing is superior to unilateral hearing, specifically in the understanding of speech in noisy environments. Furthermore, unilateral hearing reduce onés ability to localize sound. Objectives This study provides a systematic review of recent studies to evaluate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) with regards to speech discrimination, sound localization and tinnitus suppression. Data Synthesis We performed a search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Lilacs databases to assess studies related to cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness. After critical appraisal, eleven studies were selected for data extraction and analysis of demographic, study design and outcome data. Conclusion Although some studies have shown encouraging results on cochlear implantation and SSD, all fail to provide a high level of evidence. Larger studies are necessary to define the tangible benefits of cochlear implantation in patients with SSD.


2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros V. Vlastarakos ◽  
Konstantinos Proikas ◽  
George Papacharalampous ◽  
Irene Exadaktylou ◽  
George Mochloulis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dillan F. Villavisanis ◽  
Maria A. Mavrommatis ◽  
Elisa R. Berson ◽  
Christopher P. Bellaire ◽  
John W. Rutland ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e0221484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Magele ◽  
Philipp Schoerg ◽  
Barbara Stanek ◽  
Bernhard Gradl ◽  
Georg Mathias Sprinzl

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Lam ◽  
H L Cornwall ◽  
A Chaudhry ◽  
J Muzaffar ◽  
M Bance ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In otosclerosis, spongiotic bone replaces normal bone in the ossicular chain. Focal deposits may also be found within the cochlea leading to sensorineural hearing loss refractory to conventional treatment. Cochlear implantation can play an important role in the management of otosclerosis in these patients. Our study objective is to establish hearing outcomes following cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis. Method Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Results Searches identified 68 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and reporting outcomes in a minimum of 481 patients with at least 516 implants. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and non-controlled case series with small numbers of patients. Significant heterogeneity existed in terms of outcomes and methods of reporting, which precluded a meta-analysis. Access to good rehabilitation support is essential to achieving the good hearing outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures that can be expected by 12 months post-implantation in most cases. There was significant association between the radiological severity of otosclerosis and an increase in surgical and post-operative complications. Post-operative facial nerve stimulation can occur and may require deactivation of electrodes and subsequent hearing detriment. Conclusions Hearing outcomes are typically good, but patients should be counselled on associated surgical complications which may compromise hearing. Modern diagnostic techniques may help to identify potentially difficult cases to aid operative planning and patient counselling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document