scholarly journals Evaluation of an oral analgesia protocol for upper-limb fracture reduction in the paediatric emergency department: Prospective study of 101 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 1199-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Chasle ◽  
Tommaso de Giorgis ◽  
Marie-Aline Guitteny ◽  
Marie Desgranges ◽  
Zofia Metreau ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Derias ◽  
J Amen ◽  
N Morrissey ◽  
G Alexander-Harvey ◽  
J Porter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Trauma theatre time is valuable and previous studies reported cost of £24.77/minute. BSUH Children’s emergency department (CED) guidelines were implemented in December 2016, allowing reduction of forearm and distal radius (DR) fractures in CED using 70% nitrous (N2O) sedation. Due to COVID-19 pandemic and the risks associated with aerosol generating procedures as well as staffing levels, CED shifted to using 50%N2O with or without intranasal fentanyl. Method Relevant fractures presenting to CED from Feb-Dec 2020 were identified and compared to previous years. Demographics, treatment modality, timings, and outcomes were reviewed for 275 patients. Results In 2017-2018, 56% were manipulated in CED under 70%N2O (compared to only 3% in 2016). The main barrier identified was shortage of doctors trained in sedation to supervise use of 70%N20. In 2020, 101 patients were suitable for manipulation in CED. 64 had DR fractures, 37 midshaft fractures, 65 were male. Mean age: 10 years. 92 patients (91%) were manipulated in CED/fracture clinic. One was under 70%N2O; the rest used 50%N2O with or without intranasal fentanyl. 8 (9%) had manipulation under GA. Of those manipulated in CED, 3 were re-manipulated in clinic for cast problems. A typical MUA takes 30minutes indicating a saving of £743 per case; therefore, £68,356 over the study period. Conclusions Paediatric upper limb fracture manipulation in CED under N2O is effective and provides significant cost savings. Due to changes related to COVID-19 pandemic, considerably more patients in 2020 were safely treated in CED/clinic. Using 50%N2O improves uptake due to lower staffing requirements.


Author(s):  
Giorgio Cozzi ◽  
Marta Cognigni ◽  
Riccardo Busatto ◽  
Veronica Grigoletto ◽  
Manuela Giangreco ◽  
...  

AbstractThe objective of the study is to investigate pain and distress experienced by a group of adolescents and children during peripheral intravenous cannulation in a paediatric emergency department. This cross-sectional study was performed between November 2019 and June 2020 at the paediatric emergency department of the Institute for Maternal and Child Health of Trieste, Italy. Eligible subjects were patients between 4 and 17 years old undergoing intravenous cannulation, split into three groups based on their age: adolescents (13–17 years), older children (8–12 years), and younger children (4–7 years). Procedural distress and pain scores were recorded through validated scales. Data on the use of topical anaesthesia, distraction techniques, and physical or verbal comfort during procedures were also collected. We recruited 136 patients: 63 adolescents, 48 older children, and 25 younger children. There was no statistically significant difference in the median self-reported procedural pain found in adolescents (4; IQR = 2–6) versus older and younger children (5; IQR = 2–8 and 6; IQR = 2–8, respectively). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in the rate of distress between adolescents (79.4%), older (89.6%), and younger (92.0%) children. Adolescents received significantly fewer pain relief techniques.Conclusion: This study shows that adolescents experience similar pain and pre-procedural distress as younger children during peripheral intravenous cannulation. What is Known:• Topical and local anaesthesia, physical and verbal comfort, and distraction are useful interventions for pain and anxiety management during intravenous cannulation in paediatric settings. • No data is available on pain and distress experienced by adolescents in the specific setting of the emergency department. What is New:• Adolescents experienced high levels of pre-procedural distress in most cases and similar levels of pain and distress when compared to younger patients• The number of pain relief techniques employed during procedures was inversely proportional to patient’s age, topical or local anaesthesia were rarely used


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document