scholarly journals 1569 Paediatric Upper Limb Fracture Manipulation in A Children’s Emergency Department: Practice Changes During The COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Derias ◽  
J Amen ◽  
N Morrissey ◽  
G Alexander-Harvey ◽  
J Porter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Trauma theatre time is valuable and previous studies reported cost of £24.77/minute. BSUH Children’s emergency department (CED) guidelines were implemented in December 2016, allowing reduction of forearm and distal radius (DR) fractures in CED using 70% nitrous (N2O) sedation. Due to COVID-19 pandemic and the risks associated with aerosol generating procedures as well as staffing levels, CED shifted to using 50%N2O with or without intranasal fentanyl. Method Relevant fractures presenting to CED from Feb-Dec 2020 were identified and compared to previous years. Demographics, treatment modality, timings, and outcomes were reviewed for 275 patients. Results In 2017-2018, 56% were manipulated in CED under 70%N2O (compared to only 3% in 2016). The main barrier identified was shortage of doctors trained in sedation to supervise use of 70%N20. In 2020, 101 patients were suitable for manipulation in CED. 64 had DR fractures, 37 midshaft fractures, 65 were male. Mean age: 10 years. 92 patients (91%) were manipulated in CED/fracture clinic. One was under 70%N2O; the rest used 50%N2O with or without intranasal fentanyl. 8 (9%) had manipulation under GA. Of those manipulated in CED, 3 were re-manipulated in clinic for cast problems. A typical MUA takes 30minutes indicating a saving of £743 per case; therefore, £68,356 over the study period. Conclusions Paediatric upper limb fracture manipulation in CED under N2O is effective and provides significant cost savings. Due to changes related to COVID-19 pandemic, considerably more patients in 2020 were safely treated in CED/clinic. Using 50%N2O improves uptake due to lower staffing requirements.

1988 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Leung ◽  
M. Kwan ◽  
J. Wong ◽  
W. Y. Shen ◽  
A. Tsang

Injury Extra ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
E.S. Uppin ◽  
A. Khurana ◽  
U.K. Choudhuri ◽  
R. Trickett

Public Health ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Madhok ◽  
R.S. Bhopal

Bone ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sulin Cheng ◽  
Leiting Xu ◽  
Patrick H.F. Nicholson ◽  
Frances Tylavsky ◽  
Arja Lyytikäinen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah T. Lancaster ◽  
Thomas N. Grove ◽  
David A. Woods

Background A proportion of patients who sustain upper limb fractures develop post-traumatic stiffness (PTS), which may progress in a similar way to primary frozen shoulder (PFS). We have had success in treating PFS with manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) and therefore treated PTS using MUA. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS), range of motion (ROM) data pre- and post-MUA, and the need for repeat procedure were compared. Methods Sixty-four patients with PTS following an upper limb fracture, unresponsive to conservative measures, were seen between 1 January 1999 and 1 November 2015. Thirty-two patients had sustained a proximal humeral fracture, six of whom had a concurrent shoulder dislocation. MUA was performed using a standard technique. The results were compared with 487 PFS patients undergoing the same procedure. Results There was no significant difference in ROM change between the groups. Improvement in OSS was slightly greater in the PFS group (17 versus 14, p = 0.005) but, upon subgroup analysis of the PTS group, no significant difference was found for patients presenting with humeral fractures alone. Conclusions MUA results for PTS following upper limb fracture are comparable to MUA for PFS. We therefore recommend MUA in PTS cases where conservative methods have failed.


Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1835-1840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Jodoin ◽  
Dominique M. Rouleau ◽  
Camille Charlebois-Plante ◽  
Benoit Benoit ◽  
Stéphane Leduc ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e031275
Author(s):  
Kinda Ibrahim ◽  
Mark Mullee ◽  
Guiqing Lily Yao ◽  
Shihua Zhu ◽  
Mark Baxter ◽  
...  

IntroductionFalls are a major health problem for older people; 35% of people aged 65+ years fall every year, leading to fractures in 10%–15%. Upper limb fractures are often the first sign of osteoporosis and routine screening for osteoporosis is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to prevent subsequent hip fractures. However, both frailty and sarcopenia (muscle weakness) are associated with increased risk of falling and fracture but are not routinely identified in this group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of assessing and managing frailty and sarcopenia among people aged 65+ years with an upper limb fracture.Methods and analysisThis study will be conducted in three fracture clinics in one acute trust in England. 100 people aged 65+ years with an upper arm fracture will be recruited and assessed using six validated frailty measures and two sarcopenia tools. The prevalence of the two conditions and the best tools to use will be determined. Those with either condition will be referred to geriatric clinical teams for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). We will document the proportion who are referred for CGA and those who receive CGA. Other outcome measures including falls, fractures and healthcare resource use over 6 months will be collected. In-depth interviews with a purposive sample of patients who undergo the frailty and sarcopenia assessments and healthcare professionals in fracture clinics and geriatric services will be carried out to their acceptability of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in a busy environment.Ethics and disseminationThe study was given the relevant ethical approvals from NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC No: 18/NE/0377), the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, and the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Governance Office. Findings will be published in scientific journals and presented to local, national and international conferences.Trial registration numberISRCTN13848445


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document