Genetic and environmental correlations between the General Factor of Personality (GFP) and working memory

2021 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 111125
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Kawamoto ◽  
Dimitri van der Linden ◽  
Curtis S. Dunkel ◽  
Juko Ando
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Environmental Correlations ◽  
General Factor Of Personality

scholarly journals Mind-Personality Relations from Childhood to Early Adulthood

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Demetriou ◽  
George Spanoudis ◽  
Mislav Stjepan Žebec ◽  
Maria Andreou ◽  
Hudson Golino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Early Adulthood ◽  
Developmental Model ◽  
Attention Control ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
General Factor ◽  
General Factor Of Personality

We present three studies which investigated the relations between cognition and personality from 7 to 20 years of age. All three studies showed that general cognitive ability and the general factor of personality are significantly related throughout this age span. This relation was expressed in several ways across studies. The first investigated developmental relations between three reasoning domains (inductive, deductive, and scientific) and Eysenck’s four personality dimensions in a longitudinal-sequential design where 260 participants received the cognitive tests three and the personality test two times, covering the span from 9-16 years. It was found that initial social likeability significantly shapes developmental momentum in cognition and vice-versa, especially in the 9 to 11 years period. The second study involved 438 participants from 7 to 17 years, tested twice on attention control, working memory, reasoning in different domains, and once by a Big Five Factors inventory. Extending the findings of the first, this study showed that progression in reasoning is affected negatively by conscientiousness and positively by openness, on top of attention control and working memory influences. The third study tested the relations between reasoning in several domains, the ability to evaluate one’s own cognitive performance, self-representation about the reasoning, the Big Five, and several aspects of emotional intelligence, from 9 to 20 years of age (N=247). Network, Hierarchical Network, and Structural Equation modeling showed that cognition and personality are mediated by the ability of self-knowing. Emotional intelligence was not an autonomous dimension. All dimensions but emotional intelligence influenced academic performance. A developmental model for mind-personality relations is proposed.

scholarly journals Mind-Personality Relations from Childhood to Early Adulthood

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Demetriou ◽  
George Spanoudis ◽  
Mislav Žebec ◽  
Maria Andreou ◽  
Hudson Golino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Early Adulthood ◽  
Developmental Model ◽  
Attention Control ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
General Factor ◽  
General Factor Of Personality

We present three studies which investigated the relations between cognition and personality from 7 to 20 years of age. All three studies showed that general cognitive ability and the general factor of personality are significantly related throughout this age span. This relation was expressed in several ways across studies. The first investigated developmental relations between three reasoning domains (inductive, deductive, and scientific) and Eysenck’s four personality dimensions in a longitudinal-sequential design where 260 participants received the cognitive tests three times, and the personality test two times, covering the span from 9 to 16 years. It was found that initial social likeability significantly shapes developmental momentum in cognition and vice versa, especially in the 9- to 11-year period. The second study involved 438 participants from 7 to 17 years, tested twice on attention control, working memory, reasoning in different domains, and once by a Big Five Factors inventory. Extending the findings of the first, this study showed that progression in reasoning is affected negatively by conscientiousness and positively by openness, on top of attention control and working memory influences. The third study tested the relations between reasoning in several domains, the ability to evaluate one’s own cognitive performance, self-representation about the reasoning, the Big Five, and several aspects of emotional intelligence, from 9 to 20 years of age (N = 247). Network, hierarchical network, and structural equation modeling showed that cognition and personality are mediated by the ability of self-knowing. Emotional intelligence was not an autonomous dimension. All dimensions except emotional intelligence influenced academic performance. A developmental model for mind-personality relations is proposed.

scholarly journals Scoring Alternatives for Mental Speed Tests: Measurement Issues and Validity for Working Memory Capacity and the Attentional Blink Effect

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Schmitz ◽  
Dominik Rotter ◽  
Oliver Wilhelm
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Attentional Blink ◽  
Diffusion Model ◽  
Working Memory Capacity ◽  
Visual Presentation ◽  
Memory Capacity ◽  
Task Type ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
General Factor

Research suggests that the relation of mental speed with working memory capacity (WMC) depends on complexity and scoring methods of speed tasks and the type of task used to assess capacity limits in working memory. In the present study, we included conventional binding/updating measures of WMC as well as rapid serial visual presentation paradigms. The latter allowed for a computation of the attentional blink (AB) effect that was argued to measure capacity limitations at the encoding stage of working memory. Mental speed was assessed with a set of tasks and scored by diverse methods, including response time (RT) based scores, as well as ex-Gaussian and diffusion model parameterization. Relations of latent factors were investigated using structure equation modeling techniques. RT-based scores of mental speed yielded substantial correlations with WMC but only weak relations with the AB effect, while WMC and the AB magnitude were independent. The strength of the speed-WMC relation was shown to depend on task type. Additionally, the increase in predictive validity across RT quantiles changed across task types, suggesting that the worst performance rule (WPR) depends on task characteristics. In contrast to the latter, relations of speed with the AB effect did not change across RT quantiles. Relations of the model parameters were consistently found for the ex-Gaussian tau parameter and the diffusion model drift rate. However, depending on task type, other parameters showed plausible relations as well. The finding that characteristics of mental speed tasks determined the overall strength of relations with WMC, the occurrence of a WPR effect, and the specific pattern of relations of model parameters, implies that mental speed tasks are not exchangeable measurement tools. In spite of reflecting a general factor of mental speed, different speed tasks possess different requirements, supporting the notion of mental speed as a hierarchical construct.

General Factor of Personality Questionnaire (GFPQ): Only one Factor to Understand Personality?

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Amigó ◽  
Antonio Caselles ◽  
Joan C. Micó
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Disorders ◽  
Sensation Seeking ◽  
Personality Factors ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Approach And Avoidance ◽  
Sensitivity To Reward ◽  
General Factor Of Personality ◽  
Sensitivity To Punishment

This study proposes a psychometric approach to assess the General Factor of Personality (GFP) to explain the whole personality. This approach defends the existence of one basic factor that represents the overall personality. The General Factor of Personality Questionnaire (GFPQ) is presented to measure the basic, combined trait of the complete personality. The questionnaire includes 20 items and is constituted by two scales with 10 items each one: the Extraversion Scale (ES) and the Introversion Scale (IS). The GFPQ shows adequate internal consistency and construct validity, while the relationships with the personality factors of other models and with psychopathology are as expected. It correlates positively and significantly with Extraversion (E) and Psychoticism (P), and negatively with Neuroticism (N) of Eysenck's EPQ (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire); it correlates positively and significantly with the Sensation Seeking Scaled (SSS) of Zuckerman, and is inside the expected direction with Sensitivity to Reward (SR) and Sensitivity to Punishment (SP) of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ), which represent the approach and avoidance trends of behavior, respectively. It not only relates negatively with the personality disorders of the anxiety spectrum, but also with the emotional disorders in relation to anxiety and depression, and it relates positively with the antisocial personality disorder.

Construct validation using multitrait‐multimethod‐twin data: The case of a general factor of personality

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Riemann ◽  
Christian Kandler
Keyword(s):  
Study Design ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Twin Studies ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Genetic Effects ◽  
Order Structure ◽  
General Factor ◽  
General Factor Of Personality ◽  
Peer Report

We describe a behavioural genetic extension of the classic multitrait‐multimethod study design that allows estimating genetic and environmental influences on method effects in twin studies (MTMM‐T). Genetic effects and effects of the environment shared by siblings are interpreted as indicators of convergent validity. In an application of the MTMM study design, we used self‐ and peer report data to examine the higher‐order structure of the NEO‐PI‐R. Structural equation modelling did not support a general factor of personality in multimethod data. The higher‐order factor Stability turns out to be, at most, a weak trait factor. Genetic effects on method factors indicate that especially self‐reports but also peer reports show convergent validity between twins but not between methods. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The general factor of personality and creativity: Diverging effects on intrapersonal and interpersonal idea evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 110229
Author(s):  
Wiston A. Rodriguez ◽  
Yuliya Cheban ◽  
Shivani Shah ◽  
Logan L. Watts
Keyword(s):  
General Factor ◽  
General Factor Of Personality ◽  
Idea Evaluation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document