Combined endoscopic trangastric drainage and video assisted retroperitoneal pancreatic debridement – The best of both worlds for extensive pancreatic necrosis with enteric fistulae

Pancreatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 788-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Fagenholz ◽  
Ashraf Thabet ◽  
Peter R. Mueller ◽  
David G. Forcione
2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1096-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Boland ◽  
Steven Colquhoun ◽  
Vijay Menon ◽  
Amanda Kim ◽  
Simon Lo ◽  
...  

Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) continues to be a challenging problem for the surgeon. We reviewed the experience on a hepatobiliary surgical service with patients who required operative intervention for IPN with emphasis on surgical approach, timing of surgery, and complications. Between 2002 and 2008, 21 patients underwent surgery for IPN. The initial surgical approach in these 21 patients included either direct pancreatic debridement (DPD, n = 13) or transgastric debridement using cyst-gastrostomy (CG, n = 8). Fifteen patients (71%) required only a single procedure, whereas three (14%) required two procedures and three (14%) required three procedures. The mean time from onset of pancreatitis to operation was 77 days. Patients requiring a single intervention had a longer interval from onset of pancreatitis to surgery compared with those requiring multiple interventions. When comparing CG and DPD groups, there was a longer interval from onset of pancreatitis to debridement, a lower chance of needing multiple debridements, and fewer pancreatic fistulae in the CG group. Overall survival was 95 per cent. Our results demonstrate that CG can be successfully used in select patients with IPN. Patients undergoing CG are less likely to require repeat surgical debridement and to develop pancreatic fistulae compared with patients undergoing DPD.


2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Martin ◽  
Carlos V.R. Brown

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Kay Sion ◽  
Kimberly A Davis

Infected necrotizing pancreatitis is a challenging condition to treat because of the profound inflammatory response these patients undergo which can then be exacerbated by interventions. Treatment of this condition has evolved in timing of intervention as well as method of intervention and includes less invasive options for treatment such as percutaneous drainage and endoscopic drainage, in addition to less invasive endoscopic and video-assisted or laparoscopic debridements. The precise optimal treatment strategy for these patients is an ongoing topic of discussion and may be different for each patient as this is a heterogenous condition.


2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 868-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Risse ◽  
Thomas Auguste ◽  
Pierre Delannoy ◽  
Nicolas Cardin ◽  
Ivan Bricault ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. V. Shabunin ◽  
A. Yu. Lukin ◽  
D. V. Shikov ◽  
A. A. Kolotilshchikov

Aim. To clarify the indications for video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement at the late stage of pancreatic necrosis. Material and methods. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 1468 patients throughout 2012-2018. Severe destructive pancreatic necrosis occurred in 364 (24.8%) patients. Infected pancreatic necrosis needed for surgical treatment in 264 cases. We used video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement in 20 patients (8.1%).Results. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement was not associated with “open” surgery in 6 patients. There were 2-6 redo VARD procedures per patient. We diagnosed the “left-sided” and “right-sided” models of pancreas and peripancreatic space infiltrationin 4 and 2 patients, respectively. There were 14 patients who needed an “open” surgery besides video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement due to advanced inflammation. Bleeding was the only complication and occurred in 2 patients. There was 1 unfavorable outcome.Conclusion. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement is an effective minimally invasive approach of debridement. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement combined with percutaneous catheter drainage is preferable for “leftsided” and “right-sided” infiltration of pancreas and peripancreatic tissue. It is advisable to combine video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement with open surgery for “mixed model” of infiltration.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Ángel García-Ureña ◽  
Javier López-Monclús ◽  
Daniel Melero-Montes ◽  
Luis Alberto Blázquez-Hernando ◽  
Camilo Castellón-Pavón ◽  
...  

Several minimal access routes have been implemented as a step-up approach to treat infected pancreatic necrosis. We evaluate our experience with a series of consecutive patients with pancreatic collections treated with video-assisted retroperitoneal débridement (VARD). Seven patients were consecutively treated with VARD: five patients after acute necrotizing pancreatitis, one chronic pancreatitis, and one patient with perforation after endoscopic sphincterotomy. The indication for VARD was: development of sepsis, positive direct culture of the necrosis, and compartment syndrome. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and modified lateral decubitus. There were four left, two right, and one bilateral VARD. Mean hospital stay since admission to VARD procedure was 30 days (range, 12 to 72 days). Mean operative time was 63 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients needed a second procedure to control sepsis. Most patients had a long intensive care unit (ICU) stay with 6.1 days (range, 2 to 22 days) mean postoperative ICU stay. One patient had a hypernatremia as a consequence of saline lavage and three patients presented pancreatic fistula that were managed with conservative treatment. There was no mortality. VARD approach is a recommended step-up approach to treat infected pancreatic necrosis, and its indication may be extended to treat other retroperitoneal collections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document