New radiological techniques and serum biomarkers assessment in pancreatic cancer differential diagnosis

Pancreatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S169
Author(s):  
K. Lesko ◽  
L. Vinokurova ◽  
G. Varvanina ◽  
D. Bordin ◽  
J. Kuleznewa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 102193
Author(s):  
Fawaz N. Al-Shaheri ◽  
Mohamed S.S. Alhamdani ◽  
Andrea Bauer ◽  
Nathalia Giese ◽  
Markus W. Büchler ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1222-1227
Author(s):  
Yoshito Yamashita ◽  
Young-Suk Chung ◽  
Hideaki Yokomatsu ◽  
Bunzo Nakata ◽  
Tetsuzi Sawada ◽  
...  

Pancreas ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-465
Author(s):  
Huimin Zhang ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
Meng Jin ◽  
Yamin Lai ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
...  

Pancreas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1048-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Felix ◽  
Sophie Dobiasch ◽  
Matthias M. Gaida ◽  
Kathrin Schneider ◽  
Jens Werner ◽  
...  

HPB Surgery ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Carlucci ◽  
Alessandro Zerbi ◽  
Danilo Parolini ◽  
Sandro Sironi ◽  
Angelo Vanzulli ◽  
...  

Differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis is still difficult to establish. In 63 patients with suspected pancreatic neoplasm we performed: serum CA 19-9 assessment, abdominal ultrasound, CT scan and CT-guided pancreatic percutaneous fine-needle biopsy. The conclusive diagnosis was pancreatic cancer in 40 patients and chronic pancreatitis in 23 patients. With regard to the differential diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 80% and 78% for serum CA 19-9, 75% and 65% for abdominal US, 85% and 70% for CT scan, 00% and 87% for percutaneous fine-needle biopsy. We conclude that CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle biopsy is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Nolen ◽  
Aleksey Lomakin ◽  
William E. Grizzle ◽  
Nirag Jhala ◽  
Mohamad A. Eloubeidi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document