Enhancing clinical decisions about care through a pre-consultation sheet that captures patients’ views on their health conditions and treatments: A qualitative study in the field of chronic pain

2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Zanini ◽  
Paolo Maino ◽  
Jens Carsten Möller ◽  
Claudio Gobbi ◽  
Monika Raimondi ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e017906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Theresa Page ◽  
Rhonda Marise Clifford ◽  
Kathleen Potter ◽  
Liza Seubert ◽  
Andrew J McLachlan ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe Medication Appropriateness Tool for Comorbid Health conditions in Dementia (MATCH-D) criteria provide expert consensus guidance about medication use for people with dementia. This study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to implementing the criteria in practice.SettingParticipants came from both rural and metropolitan communities in two Australian states.ParticipantsFocus groups were held with consumers, general practitioners, nurses and pharmacists. Outcomes: data were analysed thematically.ResultsNine focus groups were conducted. Fifty-five participants validated the content of MATCH-D, appraising them as providing patient-centred principles of care. Participants identified potential applications (including the use of MATCH-D as a discussion aid or educational tool for consumers about medicines) and suggested supporting resources.ConclusionParticipants provided insights into applying MATCH-D in practice and suggested resources to be included in an accompanying toolkit. These data provide external validation of MATCH-D and an empiric basis for their translation to practice. Following resource development, we plan to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of implementation in practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211881742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjersti Grønning ◽  
Torunn Hatlen Nøst ◽  
Toril Rannestad ◽  
Ola Bratås

Background: Non-pharmacological interventions aim to promote health and self-management for people with chronic pain. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore if the participants’ experiences with a self-management intervention under development were aligned with the developers’ rationale and desired outcome of the intervention. Methods: This was a qualitative study interviewing both participants and developers of a chronic pain self-management intervention. Seven participants, six females and one male in the age from early thirties to mid-seventies attended the chronic pain self-management intervention developed by the staff at a Healthy Life Centre. The data were analysed by the systematic text condensation method. Results: The analyses showed that the participants evaluated the intervention as valuable. They described using coping techniques to manage their chronic pain better, and the developers stated that the aim with the intervention was to provide the participants with coping techniques. The intervention was built upon the developers’ professional knowledge and experience in cognitive techniques, health theories, models for behavioural change, and service user involvement. Conclusion: This study found that the chronic pain self-management intervention was in concordance with theory of health promotion and empowerment. The participants experienced the intervention as targeting their resources, capacities, and fulfilling social needs, which aligned with the developers aim with the intervention. The participants found the intervention evocative; they learned new ways to manage their pain through theory/education, movement exercises, homework, and sharing their experiences with each other.


2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aseel S. Abuzour ◽  
Penny J. Lewis ◽  
Mary P. Tully

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana Caetano Martins Silva ◽  
Rosana Ferreira Sampaio ◽  
Marisa Cotta Mancini ◽  
Madel Terezinha Luz ◽  
Marcus Alessandro Alcântara

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Tabeefar ◽  
Feng Chang ◽  
Martin Cooke ◽  
Tejal Patel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document